Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Katrina is playing into Bush's and the NeoCon's hands, like clockwork

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 05:52 PM
Original message
Katrina is playing into Bush's and the NeoCon's hands, like clockwork
Bush has fucked up the NO rescue so bad, it's changed the overall view of Federal Gov't amoung the minorities so negatively that it will take years to recover - IF the locals don't decide, based upon what they've seen, that Government is useless.

Government isn't useless, but it's always been a Bush plan to make the Federal Government appear so useless that people can't understand why they should pay for it. We pay for road and state taxes, yet the most bitching I hear is about the Fed Gov't. This is by design.

Let me make it clear.

Katrina wasn't a screwup.

Katrina was just part of a complex plan enacted to further decline the average citizen's distrust in what Federal Government can do for them.

Corporations, as you read this, are moving into NO, and taking up their territory that the Bush family staked out for them.

Donations are being turned away if they contain meat. Think about this. Donations from other countries like Germany and France, that consist of medical supplies, insulin, antibiotics, and all sorts of sterile equipment are being turned away because the food those shipments don't claim to make might contain Mad Cow.

Mad Cow. Wow.

I think we've got a Mad Elephant in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. and Santorum is attacking the National Weather Service
he has been trying to privitize it.

That's why it's important for any investigation to hold PEOPLE, not institutions, not "bureacracy," accountable.

The government works if the right PEOPLE are running it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Touche`
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Sorry, dupe
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 06:09 PM by etherealtruth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CascadeTide Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. exactly
The problem with holding government accountable is that people have to pay attention. Most (those with power and influence anyway) would rather get their piece of the pie and not be bothered with anything.

People are always complaining about schools or whatever and not wanting to fund them because the money is misspent. Well, go to your city council meetings and demand accountability. It's really not that difficult to ensure government works, you just have to show up. If that means cutting into an episode of Survivor though you can count out a good 30% of the population....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teknomanzer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Good point!
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 06:38 PM by teknomanzer
How many of those people are "too busy" to get involved and how many are just taking in the latest reality show dished out to them so they can observe some messages about the latest bright and shiny thing they need to buy or else be a total square.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Which I was going to post in this thread PART TWO
Oh no, this organization says that being an American is going to truly suck ass for the next six months. We'd better cut it. We don't like bad news.

Oh my fucking Me I can't believe how brazen these fucking assholes are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Lots of medicines contain cow ingredients
Not sure what kind of medical supplies are being shipped, just thinking aloud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. most minorities never trusted this administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. which is why their votes were suppressed
in Fl for 2000, and in Ohio in 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ouch! You just gave me quite a chill.
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 06:00 PM by Pacifist Patriot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. If your premise is correct
I believe that their complex plan has opened Pandora's box and it will backfire on them. (sorry to mix metaphors there..)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Actually, It's Proving how messed up the ideology is
Not enough people are buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. I agree, it's backfiring on them
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Look for lots of "feel good" human interest, Katrina Recovery stories to
start appearing.

Making Madame Bush's statement about it "working out well" for the evacuees. Lots "new fresh starts" all over the country.
While NOLA & the gulf coast undergo "Massive environmental cleanup" that leads to "Massive development" by Bush's cronies.

Yep. It's not too hard to see the overall plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. "criminal indifference to the poor"
Can't remember where I read it recently, but that about sums it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. I disagree
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 06:17 PM by DinoBoy
I think it's fairly clear that Bush's hatred of government led to the trouble, not government in general. Everyone I know, that knows even a little about Katrina (which equals everyone), knows that Bush's budgets slashed levee and seawall repair money. They also know that the aid delay was probably orchestrated by Bush, so aid arived when he did.

I think this will turn more people off to the GOP than it will to government. The GOP recklessly fucked New Orleans over, and it isn't exactly a secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You say you don't agree
and then you back up my argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. I'm confused
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 06:55 PM by DinoBoy
How does, "I think this will turn more people off to the GOP than it will to the government," play into the neocon's hands and back up your argument.

Again, my point is that Bush's response is fooling NO ONE, and that people blame Bush and the GOP, but not the concept of government in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Right wing Ayn Rand ; Anarcho-capitalist stuff?
The Vitrue of Selfishness and Anarchistic Capitalism?

http://veritasnoctis.blogspot.com/2005/07/is-anarchism-inherently-dualistic.html

Quote for the times: "As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron." - H.L. Mencken (1880-1956)

And this:

http://www.spunk.org/library/otherpol/critique/sp000051.txt

"Chapter 36: The New Right and Anarcho-capitalism

Anarcho-capitalism has recently had a considerable vogue in the West
where it has helped put the role of the State back on the political
agenda. It has become a major ideological challenge to the dominant
liberalism which sees a role for government in the protection of
property. The anarcho-capitalists would like to dismantle government
and allow complete _laissez-faire_ in the economy. Its adherents
propose that all public services be turned over to private
entrepreneurs, even public spaces like town halls, streets and parks.
Free market capitalism, they insist, is hindered not enhanced by the
State.

Anarcho-capitalists share Adam Smith's confidence that somehow private
interest will translate itself into public good rather than public
squalor. They are convinced that the 'natural laws' of economics can do
without the support of positive man-made laws. The 'invisible hand' of
the market will be enough to bring social order. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKJackson Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Your data is right, but the analasys is off
Bush didn't intend to kill a few thousand Americans. Sure, he intentionally placed us in danger through his actions, some of which had the intent of making things weaker. But Bush did not openly, consciously choose to cause this problem because it's detroying his regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Bush didn't INTEND to kill a few thousand Americans
when he got a letter from the CIA stating "Osama Bin Laden is determined to strike inside the United States".

The only difference between the two is that NOLA backed up this warning, stating things like "HUMAN SUFFERING WILL OCCUR THAT HAS NEVER BEEN SEEN BEFORE", and things like that. But again, Bush was on VACATION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brightmore Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. "Starve the Beast"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starve_the_beast

Starve-the-beast is a strategy of using budget deficits in order to force the government to reduce its spending; a timely example is the tax cutting policy under U.S. President George W. Bush. The word beast in the expression refers to the government and the programs it funds, and implies that these programs are destructive.

A current well-known proponent of starve-the-beast in the U.S. is Grover Norquist.


More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starve_the_beast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. A DU article on Norquist from 2003
http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/03/07/31_grover.html

by yours truly.:hi: I think Norquist, his thugs, and their philosophy are the single greatest threat to American Democracy today.

It always comes from inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky Bushes Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. I agree for the most part but
but I think Bush allowed it to happen on purpose so that he could say, "See, you can't depend on the government for your welfare." This goes hand in hand with his loathing of the welfare state and so-called "government handouts." He allowed it to happen to make this point, and it worked. People are saying all over the place, "Can't depend on the government." THIS IS WHY HE GUTTED FEMA!!

Let's fight back by saying that FEMA is a good thing in principle but needs to be revamped, restructured, and restaffed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Bush is about gutting the Federal bank account, in order to
kill off Social Security. NOLA just accelerated this, by design.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. In fact, I'll take this a step further, and suggest that Karl Rove himself
is just a tool, and they are all taking their marching orders from someone much more powerful.

At least that would explain why Clinton turned.

Shit, I think Bill Hicks was onto something real when he said that each new President was taken into a smokey back room and shown a clip of the Kennedy Assasination that has never been seen before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
27. Yes
Remember what Bush told Nancy Pelosi: "what went wrong?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
28. But it has forced him to enact Big Government programs
to reconstruct the Gulf coast. Right now he's eating his hat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC