David Brooks wrote a column in today's NYT entitled "The Best-Laid Plan: Too Bad It Flopped". Here's the link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/11/opinion/11brooks.htmlHe outlines the planning for the disaster, and states that the planning and the actual response were wildly different. He closes with this statement: "...liberals who think this disaster is going to set off a progressive revival need to explain how a comprehensive governmental failure is going to restore America's faith in big government."
Here is my LTTE in response to his column:
=====
David Brooks' opinion piece begins by acknowledging that this disaster was foreseen and that the much-maligned "bureaucrats" had accurately outlined the potential disaster, and laid out a comprehensive response plan that, had it been followed, would have made a huge difference in the suffering and loss of life from Hurrican Katrina. He then closes by stating that "liberals who think this disaster is going to set off a progressive revival need to explain how a comprehensive governmental failure is going to restore America's faith in big government."
I feel compelled to point out that the "big government" that failed is currently owned and operated by the Republican party: they have the Presidency, both houses of Congress and most of the Supreme Court. Most of them claim to believe in small, limited government. We see the result.
In that vein, the gutting of FEMA, including replacing trained and committed professionals with political hacks who are neither, has contributed greatly to the outrageous lack of response that we, and the world, saw.
In other words, Mr. Brooks' analysis of the situation is deeply flawed.
=====