|
Several people, here and at other events I've been to over the past few weeks, have asked me questions about the Roberts nomination as Chief Justice. Several were under the mistaken impression that a Chief Justice:
1 - Decides what cases the Supreme Court hears. Untrue. Certiorari, the way almost all cases are agreed to be heard by the Court, requires the votes of any 4 justices of the Supreme Court. The CJ's vote is not required.
2 - The Chief Justice has tie breaking voting power. False - His vote is the same as anyone else's. If there is a tie vote of 4-4 for example because one justice has for some reason excused him/her self from a case, the CJ cannot break the tie. A tie vote affirms the decision of the court below, which means that the lower court's ruling is upheld.
Of course, if a CJ is extremely persuasive he may be able to bring along an indecisive vote, but I think that is a rare ability and that only someone of unusual character like the late Earl Warren could have accomplished that. You have to understand that all of these justices are people who are brilliant in their fields (well, maybe not Thomas) and fiercely independent. There are no wilting lilies in that field.
|