Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Bush "take responsibility" for 100,000 dead in Iraq --based on LIES ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 09:58 PM
Original message
Does Bush "take responsibility" for 100,000 dead in Iraq --based on LIES ?
Taking Full Responsibility
President Bush should be commended for finally accepting “full responsibility” for his blunders in managing the Katrina recovery effort. While he’s in the mood to begin taking responsibility, we’ve offered 10 other issues for which he should also be held accountable:

- The launching of a war of choice against a country that had no WMD

- The approval of interrogation practices that led to torture at Abu Ghraib

- The failure to disclose the true cost of the Medicare prescription drug bill

- The tripling of global terrorist attacks

- The 6 million more uninsured Americans over the past four years

- The $1.40 increase in the price of gas per gallon over the past four years

- The 7 percent decrease in real value of minimum wage over the past four years

- The 11 percent increase in poverty over the past four years

- The four straight years in which median household incomes have not increased

- The all-time high trade deficit, nearing $700 billion

Feel free to add to the list.

http://www.thinkprogress.org


Feel free MEDIA to do your damn jobs !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kicked and recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mindwalker_i Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Full responsibility"
What exactly does he mean by taking responsibility? Does it mean he takes responsibility for the 100s or 1000s dead? Does he take responsibility for destroying FEMA's ability to do its job by placing good ol' buddies in charge?

Acknowledging that it could have been better by "taking responsibility" is one small step. Does this mean that Bush will make a real effort to get at the real reasons Katrina was such a major screwup? Does it translate into some form of action, like putting really competent people in charge without regard to their loyalty? Does it mean that when the next thing hits, stuff won't suck as bad?

F*** no!

It means one thing only. Bush will say, "Hey I accepted responsibility, so quit hammering me on it. Time to move on." And since any acknowledgment of his actions being less than perfect is so unprecedented that it'll go a lot farther than it should.

-mwalker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC