Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does any repuke ever tell the truth about anything?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:13 AM
Original message
Does any repuke ever tell the truth about anything?
Edited on Wed Sep-14-05 08:14 AM by leftofthedial
I'm trying to recall a specific example of any of the repukes speaking the unvarnished truth . . .

(I don't mean the bushturd's inadvertent "truths," like wishing he was a dictator, etc.)

All I ever hear is them outright, bald-facedly lying their butts off, or obfuscating, of evading, or spinning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
progmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Probably not, but do any politicans ever tell the truth?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. John Conyers, Dennis Kucinich, the Congressional Black Caucus
all have been speaking truth.

But I mean even the non-politicians, like talking heads and radio talkers . . .

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I'm jaded enough
to think that lying is a bipartisan trait. I tend to believe people who have little to lose by speaking the truth. Most politicians spin for votes.

However, I will admit that that I have never really studied the issue in regards to specific politicians. Mathematical odds would dictate there has to be an honest one out there somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. there are lying Democrats
but there also are Dems who speak the truth. Even the liars among the Dems occasionally speak truth. I can't think of a single repuke--politician or otherwise--with a commitment to the truth, or even the occasional accidental trait of speaking it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
M155Y_A1CH Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. Not after it's been spun
I've known honest politicans who have been embroiled in scandal
due entirely to spin from their lying opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurgedVoter Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. At the time of Nixon, some did.
Now they wouldn't know truth if it danced naked before them.
Originally they were fighting hard to justify selfishness as a positive force in society. The day they switched to justifying that generosity is a negative force is they day they lost all contact with reality, ethic, honor, and truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. sad truth about the Murkan right
They were involved in Kennedy's execution. Watergate was a palace coup within the repuke party. It was all based on lies--Nixon's lies AND the lies of those who brought him down and seized control of the right. Reagan was a farcical empty suit. In mythologizing him, the right disconnected itself from reality and now has degenerated to the point that, as you say, they wouldn't know the truth if it danced naked before them.

I can't think of a single truth-based or fact-based RW position on any issue or significant public statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. "to justify selfishness as a positive force"
--really works well for them as a group construct--and as you say, PurgedVoter, the next step is painting generosity as a negative.
Lord of the Flies mentality.

This philosophy appeals to people who have been taught that you can lie, cheat, and steal to get ahead. Just ally with others like you, take VERY good care of your 'friends' and DON'T get caught.
The concept of Truth in any situation is always debatable, always negotiable. It's a whole world view, expressed from the top to the bottom of society. 'The ends justify the means' is taught from birth, at different socioeconomic levels. These people are taught to be "looters" at a young age. They just do it more politely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. No!!! NEVER!!! About Anything!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Only by accident
or when they calculate it is advantageous to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. LOL!!
"They never stop thinking of ways to harm America....and neither do we." --GW Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Kahuna Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. 'puke politicians or 'puke voters?
I think most repuke voters are pretty up-front and outspoken about their bigoted views, and are proud to be assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. they are honest about basing their world view on lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. on many levels I agree
but I think there is a deeper problem. The people who been persuaded by bad information cannot help but make bad choices. Garbage in, garbage out.

The sad part is that although I know some who can honestly look at new information and continue to make new decisions as more information is gained, I know far more that are very stubborn and now would never admit they were wrong.

They stuck up for Bush before and now that the crap is hitting the fan (although it's actually been sitting in front of the fan since 1980), they refuse to admit that maybe they were fooled or that they were wrong and will go on justifying their actions, blame the Clintons for everything, and call everyone else "brainwashed socialists."

Or maybe that's just my family. Who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. anyone who still supports the bushturd
is either a criminal accomplice, remaining willfuly ignorant

or is mentally ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. I once heard McCain admit he was wrong
for not denouncing the confederate flag in S.C. Does that count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I guess that would count as a kind of honesty
any other examples?

especially related to their key issues--war on terror, family values, trickle down economics . . .

ALL are based on lies and require an ever-widening web of lies to sustain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. They said Shrub didn't have the intelligence
THAT I can believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. who said that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. They said he didn't have the intelligence that there were no WMD's
Another bizarre twist of logic. Since he didn't have the intelligence of NO WMD's he had to attack Iraq.

I've heard that argument somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. Oh. I thought you meant that some repuke admitted
that the bushturd is stupid

instead of just blaming the CIA for neocon venality and lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Well, they like a guy who doesn't "over-think" things
And it's part of his "charm" that he gets things wrong. Just like the rest of us fallible mortals, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BarbaRosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. Only after all other options have been explored
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. in the case of the bushturd, I don't think the truth is even an option
he considers.

he lies even when it is not necessary

(then the propaganda machine MSM lets him hide behind his idiot persona)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
19. Only when forced to...
Mostly, they can't, because the truth never favors them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
23. If he does...
...he's breaking with his party. Such shows of independent thought are to be encouraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
24. Nope truth is edited out of their talking points, and all of their other
points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PunkPop Donating Member (847 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
25. Ron Paul
Although technically I guess he's a Libertarian.

But he affiliates himself with the Republican party (i.e. puts an 'R' after his name).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. good catch
he does occasionally call a spade a spade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
26. Never. If they say something, the opposite is true.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. that is my experience with them.
Sometimes, their entire purpose seems to be to destroy truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
31. Most honest:Rudman - then Paul, Leach, Jones, and sometimes Hagel
and sometimes Lugar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. examples?
Some of those you mention are able to speak reasonably truthfully about minor issue, but are either down with the lies or at best silent when push comes to shove on repuke doctrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Rudman wrote Hart-Rudman Report on Global Terror with Hart. His
integrity is the reason why Bush flat out rejected him for the 9-11 commission, even though he was the preferred choice of the 9-11 families. He's also the one who convinced Bush1 to nominate Souter, a moderate, to the Supreme Court.

Rudman is also an old-fashioned Republican, more of the Jim Jeffords sort.

Leach was the only Republican to vote AGAINST Newt Gingrich as speaker. He's also very much against the exploitation of religion and publcly decried their alliance with Moon.

The others all have had their differences applauded here every now and then.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Hart-Rudman does seem to be fairly honest
any other post-coup of 2000 examples?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
32. Only their truth which is bull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
33. If Republicans ever told the truth
No one would ever vote for them. It's that simple. They have to lie to survive politically. I mean, who would vote for a guy who wants you broke, worked to death, with no medical insurance or retirement funds, no worker protections, no child labor laws, no nothing? You'd have to be insane to vote for a Republican. So they lie and lie and lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. if anyone still fails to see those lies, they are negligent
any bushturd supporter now is either a criminal, whether through intent, negligence or insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. that is a fact
they have to hide behind lies or they'd all be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
40. Truth? Truth? That's sooo pre-post-modern
Edited on Wed Sep-14-05 07:01 PM by jokerman93
There is no truth out here in the post modern desert, only the muscular framing of disputable facts, and the Darwinian struggle of competing reality memes. It's like the legends of the last days of Atlantis, for cripes sake! I'll be so glad when this reality-building obsession is over and we can get back to civil discourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC