Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brown speaking out mainly against Blanco, BUT......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 06:33 AM
Original message
Brown speaking out mainly against Blanco, BUT......
Edited on Thu Sep-15-05 07:12 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/nationworld/sfl-abrown15sep15,0,3027611.story?coll=sfla-news-nationworld

Note the title of the article

Brown says state officials were disorganized


Governor of Louisiana is criticized

By David D. Kirkpatrick
and Scott Shane The New York Times
Posted September 15 2005

But then snip ---------------------

He focused much of his criticism on Blanco, contrasting what he described as her confused response with far more agile mobilizations in Mississippi and Alabama, as well as in Florida during last year's hurricanes.

But his account -- in which he described making "a blur of calls" all week to Chertoff, Card and Hagin, the deputy White House chief of staff -- suggested that President Bush, or at least his top aides, were informed early and repeatedly by the top federal official at the scene that state and local authorities were overwhelmed and that the overall response was going badly.

A senior administration official said Wednesday night that White House officials recalled the conversations with Brown but did not believe they had the urgency or desperation he described in the interview.

"There's a general recollection of him saying, `They're going to need more help,'" said the official, who asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of internal White House discussions.

Brown's version of events raises questions about whether the White House and Chertoff acted aggressively enough in ratcheting up the response. The account also suggests that responsibility for the failure may go well beyond Brown, who has been widely pilloried as an inexperienced manager who previously worked overseeing horse show judges.

Brown said he had been hobbled by limitations on the power of the agency to command needed resources. With only 2,600 employees nationwide, he said, FEMA must rely on state workers, the National Guard, private contractors and other federal agencies to supply manpower and equipment.

He said his biggest mistake was in waiting until the end of the day on Tuesday, Aug. 30, to explicitly ask the White House to take over the response from FEMA and state officials.


On Edit: The Today Show, Bushco's morning mouthpiece just mentioned the article and Never mentioned these little details of what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. If I'm going down, I'm taking everyone with me....
Eat your own, Brown, eat your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. Thank God for self preservation!
Spill the beans Brownie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsUnited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting article all around. Thanks for posting.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Your welcome. What really is interesting is that on August 28th Bush
took full responsibility when he signed the state of emergency. It seems that little detail is escaping most everyone.


Click here: http://www2.dccc.org/docs/conyersgaokatrina.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well he has since said
That to the extent Federal Governmentfailed he is responsible.

But that "to the extent" at the beginning causes me to doubt his sincerity.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Just watching him say this showed that he wasn't sincere. He was
like a petulant child made to apologize (which he never really did) for something and was forced to do so. He is so frigging arrogant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Blanco has responsibility, not shrub.
Fed 'emergency', puts Fema into emergency mode,
'state of emergency' does not give
the Feds any more authority over state decisions

State Police --> Blanco is commander-in-chief
National Guard --> Blanco is commander-in-chief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Links for you.
Edited on Thu Sep-15-05 08:34 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. response
first link, rawstory

I an not second guessing the timeliness of
these various state and federal decrees.
Gov. Blanco took the usual steps, so did Bush.
Federal Emergency, does not change resposibility.


I suppose it could be said that the federal gov't
is in charge of the federal response.
With that said, the primary guardian of an individual
citixen is the state. The Federal govt can provide
advice to the locals, can help when asked, thru Fema, which
hs some supplies of it's own. and knows where other stuff is.

second link, conyers***katrina.pdf
how big is it? , could'nt get it to load
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Blanco asked for help. She had to call back the next day.
Edited on Thu Sep-15-05 10:17 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
I don't understand what you are not getting. Bush didn't even care what was happening. He wasn't even watching the tv or looking at headlines. He ate cake, played guitar and gave speeches while NOLA drowned.

This is an excellent compilation by Newsweek (ouch) Entitled "How Bush Blew It"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9287434

The PDF report is 25 pages long which includes all of the necessary documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Chertoff delayed federal response, memo shows
recall this article?

Write your congressional Reps and Senators

telling them that bushie and the FEDS didn't use the power they were given -- and giving them MORE isn't going to fix the problem.

Be sure to read this

http://www.timesleader.com/mld/timesleader/news/politic...

Chertoff delayed federal response, memo shows

WASHINGTON - (KRT) - The federal official with the power to mobilize a massive federal response to Hurricane Katrina was Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, not the former FEMA chief who was relieved of his duties and resigned earlier this week, federal documents reviewed by Knight Ridder show.

Even before the storm struck the Gulf Coast, Chertoff could have ordered federal agencies into action without any request from state or local officials. Federal Emergency Management Agency chief Michael Brown had only limited authority to do so until about 36 hours after the storm hit, when Chertoff designated him as the "principal federal official" in charge of the storm.

As thousands of hurricane victims went without food, water and shelter in the days after Katrina's early morning Aug. 29 landfall, critics assailed Brown for being responsible for delays that might have cost hundreds of lives.

But Chertoff - not Brown - was in charge of managing the national response to a catastrophic disaster, according to the National Response Plan, the federal government's blueprint for how agencies will handle major natural disasters or terrorist incidents. An order issued by President Bush in 2003 also assigned that responsibility to the homeland security director.

But according to a memo obtained by Knight Ridder, Chertoff didn't shift that power to Brown until late afternoon or evening on Aug. 30, about 36 hours after Katrina hit Louisiana and Mississippi. That same memo suggests that Chertoff may have been confused about his lead role in disaster response and that of his department.

Chertoff's Aug. 30 memo is posted at www.krwashington.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes, I recall this from the other day. Thank you for posting.
According to the National Response Plan, which was unveiled in January by Chertoff's predecessor, Tom Ridge, the secretary of homeland security is supposed to declare an Incident of National Significance when a catastrophic event occurs.


"Standard procedures regarding requests for assistance may be expedited or, under extreme circumstances, suspended in the immediate aftermath of an event of catastrophic magnitude," according to the plan, which evolved from earlier plans and lessons learned after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. "Notification and full coordination with the States will occur, but the coordination process must not delay or impede the rapid deployment and use of critical resources."


Should Chertoff have declared Katrina an Incident of National Significance sooner - even before the storm struck? Did his delay slow the quick delivery of the massive federal response that was needed? Would it have made a difference?


"You raise good questions," said Frank J. Cilluffo, the director of George Washington University's Homeland Security Planning Institute. It's too early to tell, he said, whether unfamiliarity with or glitches in the new National Response Plan were factors in the poor early response to Katrina.


"Clearly this is the first test. It certainly did not pass with flying colors," Cilluffo said of the National Response Plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Chertoff seems to have followed the plan
do you expect Chertoff, on the word of Brown
{to the effect that 'the locals are slow'}
to deviate from the plan?

two problems I have with that are,

the locals are generally assumed to know more
about their area and problems, Chertoff now has to
choose between Brown, and trusting the locals

to deviate from the plan, would set a bad precident
in so far as letting locals off the hook in the
bacic responsibility of asking for what is needed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. White House to take over the response from FEMA...FEMA needed rescue?
WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. What can one expect from a government stamped bona fide
cretin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Add to all of who was in charge -- and who knew what -- when
Talking Points Memo -- has a small bit about Cheney's office calling the power company in Mississippi and demanding that power to the pipe line be restored -- which CUT power to the hospital.

So .. . was Cheney really on vacation or in a bunker somewhere playing at being the Prez?

The whole response needs to be investigated -- supplies to a New Orleans hospital were diverted by FEMA -- and patients probably died due to FEMA's mismanagement of critical supplies to a HOSPITAL.

So WHO was stealing hospital supplies and WHERE did they go?

Sounds like a massive investigation needs to be started ASAP -- and apparently the Republicans have something to hide?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Let's not forget FEMA cutting the lines of communication and
how so very quickly a no-bid contract was awarded once again to Halliburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. The Federal Government Deliberately Withheld Aid and Assistance
A lot of people made mistakes, however the Federal Government did it deliberately.

When your own government decides not to commit resources and also actively blocks resources during a National Emergency then they are murderers.

There is no blame to share, it all goes to the criminals in the Bush Administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Done with stone cold deliberateness. No doubt in my mind. I was
Edited on Thu Sep-15-05 07:56 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
trying to display how the WH was turning a deaf ear.

As Bush sat for 7 minutes on 9/11, he sat for days with purpose to not act on Katrina. I am looking forward to Moore's film when he does another split screen demonstrating the horror of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. They fail to lead on purpose
That's their MO

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
triguy46 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. "hobbled" , a term he brought with him from the horse biz...
Didn't any one else notice how well pressed his shirt was and how clean and well fed he looked on "You're doin a great job Brownie" day??? He sure hadn't been missing any meals or sleep or baths or laundry. He was somehow able to keep so neat and nice while making his "blur" of calls. Damn that punching numbers in the phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC