Dems should vote together against Roberts since Bush wounded
yurbud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-05 08:39 AM
Original message |
Dems should vote together against Roberts since Bush wounded |
|
pushing up roberts all the way to chief justice was a hail mary pass--and the Dems need to intercept. Although they can't directly block his approval, it would be a major embarrassment to the right if this was even a party line vote.
They could stick the shiv in deeper by saying "We are deeply disappointed that President Bush chose such a bald-faced political partisan extremist. President Reagan and even the PRESIDENT'S FATHER had the wisdom to nominate judges we could all support. The YOUNGER PRESIDENT BUSH failed to learn this important lesson from his father."
A side benefit of this would be to defend themselves, they'd have to say "Dad didn't do that! He put up Clarence Thomas! He was an extremist too!" Thus make the rest of their party look untrustworthy too.
|
Tace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-16-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I Agree That The Democrats Need To Oppose The Nomination |
|
The illegitimate administration should not be appointing Supreme Court justices.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:22 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.