Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reuters Says Bush Photo Not 'Malicious,' Reports Wide Interest

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Seansky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:42 PM
Original message
Reuters Says Bush Photo Not 'Malicious,' Reports Wide Interest
From BuzzFlash link...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Drudge says it's "enhanced", which it is. I thought so when i saw it
Edited on Thu Sep-15-05 10:45 PM by digno dave
the first time. The "levels" are bumped up along with the contrast. The paper looks too white and the pencil writing too dark. That said, it's still his writing and speaks volumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Drudge is on crack. It's real.. see link to Buzzflash story below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, it's real.
But they used Photoshop to make the note more readable. Heightened contrast?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Somewhere Rueters said it was enhanced
standard practice to do some enhancing to best display the subject of an image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Here's what they did:
Wilking shot about 200 images and sent two memory cards to the press room at the U.N., where Hershorn was working. Hershorn looked at the images on a computer and initially decided not to send any of them.

But a few hours later, he started to wonder about a note that Bush was seen writing in three of the pictures. Out of curiosity, he zoomed in to see if he could read it.

Once he saw what it said, Hershorn decided the note was interesting and worth publishing. The white parts of the picture were overexposed, so a Reuters processor used Photoshop to burn down the note. This is a standard practice for news photos, Hershorn says, and the picture was not manipulated in any other way.

http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001137642
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. That's not the same as faked or even re-touched
I assume the treatment was done digitally, in Photoshop. Pretty much all photo "processing" for web publication is done that way. In conventional dark room developing, even, this is done all the time. Dodging and burning...highlighting important areas, darkening the non-important. Newspaper photos get this treatment all the time. It is an old technique. It doesn't change ANYTHING about what is going on in the picture, it only makes it a "better" photograph, artistically. Anyone who tries to equate "enhanced" with "retouched" doesn't know much about photography. (Not saying you don't understand...just people in general).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. ROFL!! Irish Headline: "To Pee or Not to Pee, That is the Question."
(snip)

The fact is, according to Reuters -- and this has not been widely reported -- President Bush did indeed take a bathroom break after passing the note to Rice.

This apparently raised some eyebrows around the room, because American representatives (among others) have a reputation for suddenly bolting, though normally for a far different reason than this latest one. Fair or not, the European press has already had a field day with the photo, often centering on the notion that Bush had to ask Rice for permission.

The Times of London, for example, ran no less than three separate articles about it on its Web site, one at the top of its front page. (It's a Murdoch paper.) One headline reads: "Excuse me Condi, can I go to the bathroom?" Another story, believe it or not, opens: "The need to relieve oneself diplomatically has on occasion determined the fate of nations." The third discusses the sordid history of the particulatar lavatory in question, and contains this passage: "Medical experts said that the 59-year-old President was wise not to wait any longer."

The headline at the BBC news site suggested that Bush had been "caught short" at the U.N. summit. The Irish Examiner headline? "To Pee or Not to Pee, That is the Question." Der Spiegel in Germany translated a bathroom break" as "eine Toiletten-Pause."


(snip)

So, Junior really did take a bathroom break after passing the note to Condi, hmm?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriate Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. oh Gawd, I will never again be able to think of
a bathroom break as anything other than "eine Toiletten-Pause."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Austria fell to the German anschluss in the 30's
Because one member of their parliament took a bathroom break at the wrong moment.

(I once did a high school term paper on Austria in the 20's and 30's. That's absolutely the only detail I remember from it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC