Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reconciling the impossibly low death toll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:32 AM
Original message
Reconciling the impossibly low death toll
Look, I know there are still a lot of areas to be covered, but it is clear by the fact that Rove is in charge, and the 4 1/2 mile razor wire fence around hard-hit Long Beach, MS, -- not the mention Kenyon -- that there is a concerted effort to keep the "official" body count well below that of 9/11. A higher figure would be political disaster for Mr. "I'll protect you."

But, here is where they may get tripped up. I keep hearing about all the orphaned kids. Tons of 'em, scattered all over the place. Those kids had parents. If there are thousands of orphans but only a relatively small number of dead (which, remember, already includes some children), where did the kids come from? Immaculate conceptions? The math isn't going to add up if they try to pull the disappearing body bullshit that Rove apparently has up his sleeve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm hoping they're telling the truth about the death toll, and the kids
are just separated from their parents.

Sheesh, though... after two weeks of phone calls you'd think most people would have found their families.

I'm finding it very hard to reconcile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Actually, early estimates were 200-300 dead in NOLA....
It's when people started to get exhausted and emotional that the estimates went WAY up. I think a couple of hundred would be on the low side, but I never believed the 10,000+ number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually, the computer projections called for up to 61,000
While I don't believe that figure, either, I cannot help but feel the "hundreds" figure is impossibly low. Just watch the video of the damage. Total devastation for mile upon mile upon mile. Not just NOLA, but places like Long Beach, MS. The number of people reporters were seeing tied to lamp posts, floating down streets...what about the miles of streets and neighborhoods they were NOT reporting from?

Look, I don't WANT a high death toll. But those initial projections weren't made in a vaccuum, and they only seemed to change -- drastically lower -- after BushCo began taking fire for inaction. Not to metion the absolute political necessity for BushCO to keep the total below 9/11 numbers...I'm very concerned. Especially with Rove and Kenyon involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The computer projections were based on a direct hit on NO
which this wasn't.

Keep in mind that most of the deaths weren't caused by the hurricane. They were caused by the flooding and the aftermath.

Also keep in mind that the counting is very likely not over yet. The final figure could be weeks away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnfantTerrible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. The Government sent 25,000 bodybags!
They weren't expecting only a few hundred deaths. They were preparing for the worst because they know how bad it really is. The Medical Examiners office was told by officials to expect 40,000 bodies. I have heard tell of bodies being moved out of state on Semi's and brought to warehouses! It sounds insane, even as I type this, I realize it sounds insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sounds insane? That's about right for BushCo
Only indicate to me that there is probably a lot of truth in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think anyone is calling those kids "orphans", yet...
most are presumed to be separated from their parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. Trying to find the page I was on when the browser crashed
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 09:30 AM by soup
earlier this morning. It was in a photo gallery of today's news.

In New Orleans - they'd marked the house one body inside. The caption included the info that the death had occured about 5 days ago and would not be considered storm-related as the body was found surrounded by empty liquor bottles.

just noted for what it's worth - still looking for the source. I'll add it when/if I find it.

Who knows how the toll is being figured...

on edit: found it. Can't get the pic to transfer. Here's the caption and the page:

Scenes from New Orleans

Photo by: Conrad Schmidt
A New York City police officer leaves the home on the right on Port Street in the Bywater District of New Orleans, where one body was found. A NYPD officer said the body appeared dead for only five days and the cause of death was not storm-related nor a homicide. The body was surrounded by empty bottles of alcohol, officers said.
http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/gallery?Site=DG&Date=20050914&Category=HURRICANE&ArtNo=509140802&Ref=PH&Params=Itemnr=7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. They'll play with numbers and semantics
They'll create all sorts of special categories of death, giving them one lower figure to use as "the official death toll." Like that in Iraq, it will be but a small fraction of the reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. This is such bull shit
remember the parrish that had 152 bodies and they said 20 were storm related - so 132 died of natural causes in a few days in a small area - any body pulled out of there is storm related whether they drank themselves to death, shot themselves like the police office who came homw and found his wife and kids dead - however anyone died during this period it almost has to be storm related -or at least they should only subtract the normal number of deaths in the geo in say a five day period - I HATE THESE PEOPLE - I want the number to be low but I want the truth!!! God I hope someone finds it - I never thought it would be in the tens of thousands - but I know it is more than 3,000 - fucking liars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Isn't it?
I'm thinking that with the length of time this is going to take, and other news taking front page - it will sadly fall to page 2, section D as the numbers increase - not unlike the death toll in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. 2000 Children still missing. How many are with abusers, Mr Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC