Did you hear?

[boston bean]

That Rep. Curt Weldon is bringing forth a pentagon employee who said he was ordered to destroy the Able Danger data.

Oh when did this alleged act of treason against the american people occur.

I will tell you.

LATE SEPTEMBER 2001!

His quest to make the dems on the 911 Commission look bad has led him to bring a pentagon employee to hearing next week in front of the Judiciary committee to tell them who ordered the destruction of the information.

But the white house wants the hearings classified.

[JuniperLea]

1. Where is Ollie North when the Righties need him?

He was great at turning an act of treason into patriotism.

This should get interesting.

[MADem]

5. A bit too much info to hide in your underwear though

Which is what Fawn Hall did, in addition to shredding to beat the band!!! http://www.nndb.com/people/241/000085983/

[seemslikeadream]

2. Zelikow NEVER told the 9/11 Commission about ABLE DANGER

Shoomaker NEVER told Clinton

Able Danger is a Pandora's Box that will blow up in the RW's face.
Re-open the 9/11 investigation? BRING IT ON! Here's why:

So the responsibility for stopping DIA program Able Danger, which had Identified Atta and 3 other hijackers and linked them to 56 other al-Queda terrorists overseas, has been laid at the feet of Bill Clinton--except he and Richard Clarke were never told about it at all.

That's right. Bill Clinton was never told about Able Danger and the ID of Atta because Richard Clarke was never told about AD. How do I know? He never wrote about it in his book, nor did he testify about it's existence before the 9-11 Commission!

You see Richard Clarke was known for being obsessed with Osama Bin Laden and HE was the guy the neo-con moles did not want to find out about Atta and the gang. Schoomaker and the neo-cons knew telling the FBI would inform Clarke and then Mr. Laser Beam himself, President of the United State William Jefferson Clinton, would have gotten involved--and the Pearl Harbor-type attack would never take place (the neo-cons talked about the need for a Pearl Harbor-type attack before the PNAC Plan would be accepted by the American people--so when one presented itself, they let it happen).

General Pete Schoomaker, who were later heavily rewarded by the neo-cons in the Bush Administration, blocked the upward motion of the DIA information by having Shaffer and Philpott meet with Pentagon lawyers opinions--lawyers who were rubberstamping ridiculous legal opinions to carry out the neo-con plan. These certain people were neo-cons in the Clinton Administration, covertly carrying out the PNAC plan to let a Pearl Harbor-type attack occur so Iraq and 6 other countries could be invaded
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1784181

[annabanana]

4. neo-cons in the Clinton Administration

like who..
Will Marshall, maybe?

[MADem]

3. A link to the issue in question, for those who haven't yet heard

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1131137

WASHINGTON Sep 15, 2005 — A Pentagon employee was ordered to destroy documents that identified Mohamed Atta as a terrorist two years before the 2001 attacks, a congressman said Thursday.

The employee is prepared to testify next week before the Senate Judiciary Committee and was expected to identify the person who ordered him to destroy the large volume of documents, said Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa.

Weldon declined to identify the employee, citing confidentiality matters. Weldon described the documents as "2.5 terabytes" as much as one-fourth of all the printed materials in the Library of Congress, he added.


But then, they wanted to sweep it under the rug, ya see....

On Wednesday, former members of the Sept. 11 commission dismissed the "Able Danger" assertions. One commissioner, ex-Sen. Slade Gorton, R-Wash., said, "Bluntly, it just didn't happen and that's the conclusion of all 10 of us."

Weldon responded angrily to Gorton's assertions. "It's absolutely unbelievable that a commission would say this program just didn't exist," Weldon said Thursday...

[Bernardo de La Paz]

6. I heard proper thread titles keeps out riffraff & attracts interested ppl.

[boston bean]

7. .

if you can do it better than why don't you post another thread with a better title.