Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media should poll JUST wealthiest 2% asking if they'd give up their taxcut

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:10 AM
Original message
Media should poll JUST wealthiest 2% asking if they'd give up their taxcut
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 11:13 AM by blm
to help rebuild New Orleans.

I predict that most would.

And I believe it would be overwhelming - like 70%.

The problem in the US is that only the 30% who are fascist dumbasses control the Republican party and the White House and get all the media attention for their pet fascist legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. you give them a lot more credit than I do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. And who needs a poll anyway
If any of them want to give up their tax cut, all they have to do is send in a check to the IRS and write a note explaining the check is for the federal debt to be reduced on it and the government will take it gladly.

I bet they get few checks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. The 2%ers didn't get
there by being generous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Most I know did...but, they were from NY, Cali, Mass, Chicago, Cleveland.
I do think that they also see that the way things are going, there will be no middle-class consumers in the near future to keep them in that 2% if the basic economic policies of this country don't change soon.

Some may be heartless but most aren't dumb. They made plenty of bucks under Clinton with an expanding middle class. Now, Bush policies only expands the working poor while shrinking the middle class.

It's becoming too clear to deny any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. but they're not all evil
some got there with good companies doing good things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Liberal Hollywood" would, they've already said so
I've heard lots of actors say they didn't need Bush's tax cut, although I doubt most are even close to the top 2%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't think they would
they probably think that it's good that so many poor ('useless' in their minds) people died so that they are no longer being a tax burden on them. Being that property is far more important to the extreme wealthy than people are.

The rich didn't get rich by being benevolent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not every rich person is Paris Hilton and Sam Walton.
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 11:49 AM by chalky
You've also got your George Clooneys and Michael Moores, too. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. And for every Bill Gates, there's a Bill Gates, Sr. telling it straight
and often with his buddy Warren Buffett.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rude Horner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Would be an interesting poll, wouldn't it.
Although I wonder if their answer in the poll would be "ok", yet right after the poll they might be on the phone to Shrub sayin' "no way!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Check out this site - RESPONSIBLE WEALTH - what a concept!!!
http://www.responsiblewealth.org/
<snip>
"Responsible Wealth is a national network of businesspeople, investors and affluent Americans who are concerned about deepening economic inequality and are working for widespread prosperity. Our three primary areas of work are tax fairness, corporate responsibility and living wages."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. That's exactly why I feel optimistic about the choice.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't know if the top 2% is split like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'll be happy to
When I win the 250 million Mega Millions tonight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why do 'they' have to be asked? Can't 'they' see the need for their
tax bonus' to be rescinded? The wealthiest 2% in this Country haven't had to sacrifice whatsoever at all in the last five years. Why should they HAVE to be ASKED to pony up, pitch in and pay, to help those who've contributed to their wealth. These GREED PIGS who had no problem taking their tax cuts, which they DID NOT NEED, should let their conscious :rofl: be their guide. I have little faith in the wealthiest 2% who accepted huge tax cuts, knowing that social programs the poor desperately needed would be cut so they might enjoy a fourth vacation home or a luxury vacation or whatever the mega rich spend their fortunes on. Disgusting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Actually, it's not to sway them, it's to sway Bush and the GOP.
And so he can't claim that his taxcuts are needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. forget that. I canvassed some of these people last fall and I was
sickened by their responses. I went up to million+ dollar homes with big SUVs and the only reason they voted for * was taxes. They felt they paid too much. Why ask? Just do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Wow, really? That is pretty sick.
Some people are obscenely wealthy. Really. They don't need a second Leer Jet or a fourth vacation home on the Pacific Ocean. And I'm sorry, some of it is not their money. Some of them stand on the backs of the working class. They don't pay living wages. They also stand by while programs for the poor and disabled get slashed into confetti, perhaps comfort themselves with handing out a bit of food for the homeless on Sundays and think they're good "Christians."

The rich freepers know that their hearts are greedy. Deep down, they even know it's wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC