Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ontario, Can. on 10/2 voted with paper ballots - count finished in 1 hr.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 10:21 AM
Original message
Ontario, Can. on 10/2 voted with paper ballots - count finished in 1 hr.

http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_xymphora_archive.html#106516635608139568

The boring Canadian province of Ontario had an election yesterday, and the voters finally managed to kick out the right-wing American-influenced tax cutters, replacing them with a party whose main promise was that it would not cut taxes so that it would have enough money to pay for things considered inessential by the previous government, such as health care, education, public security and safety, and the electricity supply. A little sanity in an insane world. The interesting thing is the mechanics of the voting procedure. The election used paper ballots which were counted by hand at each polling station, with the results telephoned in to the Returning Officers, who communicated the results to the media. Ontario is a huge place, with over 11 million people on 415,000 square miles or over one million square kilometers (at the longest points, 1,000 miles high and 1,000 miles wide), and yet this old-fashioned system produced election results in about an hour, with the winner giving his victory speech less than two hours after the polls closed. Since paper ballots were used, and absolutely no computers were involved in the balloting process, the ballots can be recounted at any time should there be any dispute, and the ballots themselves serve as decisive evidence of the validity of the results. When I look at computer voting, I see a system which is in every possible way inferior to the paper ballot system:

-snip-

2. Let's face facts. The voting machine companies are all owned by doctrinaire extreme-right-wing Republicans. If the United States holds fair elections in the next round, the Republicans will lose. The Republicans need these machines. Their main purpose, after making money for their creators, is to cheat.


People should go after these awful voting machines like the Luddites went after automated weaving machines: with sledgehammers. Paper ballots have worked well and have formed the basis for the whole history of Anglo-American democracies (with marked shards in urns going back to ancient Athens), and there is no good reason for voting machines. Paper ballots, counted by hand!
--------------------------

"11 million people on 415,000 square miles" voted on paper and the paper was counted in about 1 hr.

Kill the Voting Machines!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not only that....
Prince Edward Island had a provincial election with no power, with paper ballots, all one needs is some candles and a pencil!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Wow--you mean P.E.I. still doesn't have power...
After Hurricane Juan hit? Sounds like parts of northeastern North Carolina and southeastern Virginia!

And yet, they went foward with an election--pretty brave, and pretty great. Well, I guess it proves you all have the good sense to use something to register votes that's countable in ANY situation. I admit, I used to find it strange that other democracies--and particularly Canada--still used paper ballots to vote, and thought it really inefficient. Soooo much for lionizing the "convenience" of voting machines and computerized voting; I'll sure never make THAT major judgement error again! Neither the Tories nor Liberals could mess with the outcome if they wanted to with that fool-proof system. If we want to see how the OTHER side of things look--manipulation of computerized voting on a national scale--we have only to look south, to Mexico. That is a preview of what Diebold's brass and more than one Bush have in store for us in 2004 if they get their way.

Now we just have to make sure that our side is as resolute as they are up in Prince Edward Island!:eyes:

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. IBM . . . . . Its Better Manual
"automated weaving machines"

Brought us the punched card as an information device.

"with sledgehammers"

Looks like paper covered hammer in that battle.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. More detail, for those who are interested in our boring old system...
There are 103 election ridings across Ontario, each with around 80,000 voters - some a bit more, some a bit less. Each riding will have about 200 or so polling stations, though there are sometimes mutliple polling stations in a single location.

For the province:
103 ridings
23081 total polling stations
Just over 4.48 million votes cast
Turnout 55%
Polls closed 8:00 pm
Liberal majority government called 8:23 pm

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC