Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NO....I'm confused about the "poor"??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:56 PM
Original message
NO....I'm confused about the "poor"??
It sounds to me that many thousands that were evacuated were working poor homeowners that may have lived paycheck to paycheck (like most of us)but where NOT on the government handouts (welfare etc). If they were working and homeowners why is everyone treating them like they are a drain on society?
Do we have an demographics of HHI and home ownership?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meisje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Most of the properties were rentals
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 01:59 PM by meisje
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. many of the people I saw interviewed
were people who were working, nursing assistants, store clerks, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Common misconception
Most of the poor are "working" poor. They are the ones in all these great new jobs Bush has created in the service sector. Even those who have jobs that are a little higher on the ladder are still underpaid much of the time. My opinion is that, contrary to being a drain on society, they are the foundation of today's society. Cheap labor is the mantra of American business today. :( Most of them could not get along without it unless they made major changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. That's my point
Living as a working poor in NO I imagine you can still afford a small home. Cost of living must be much different than living poor in Detroit. I understand that IF they were homeowners they probably didn't have flood insurance. On a show last night they interviewed a (white) 30's female lawyer from NO. She worked 10 years to become a lawyer and has lost everything, including her ability to practice. It will take her 6 months to study and pass the TX Bar. I'm sure she will have no problem studing while living in a sheltor!:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
35. It is different from Detroit.
Having been born in Detroit and living with someone born in New Orleans, I have detected some differences.

First off. Prices to live in New Orleans were extremely cheap.
You could buy a Shotgun shack (2bed 1bath) for 60 grand in the year 2000. A family can work extra third jobs and save four years and get 10% of that, if their kids work too.

Because second, good paying jobs were VERY hard to find in New Orleans. I bough the Times-Picayune every week for 3 months during 1999 before the market fell and I couldn't find almost anything in the 5-8 fields I have experience in. Jobs asking for 5 years experience were offering $8.50 per hour.

Low rent with lower wages creates a black hole effect. An Inflation Hole where residents have a wage that wont get them through to a job in a better paying town.

Third is heat. Detroit residents need to pay for heat. This may be balanced by costs of air conditioning in NOLA. I never lived there long enough to get on a lease so i wouldn't know.

But fourth is Detroit is a city were you can't not have a car. We know how this fact fits in to survival.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Additional points people may overlook...
1) In the South, there are almost no unions. There is always someone more desperate who will take lower pay/worse working conditions over unemployment.

2) Welfare rewards people who don't work and who aren't married. Try to better yourself, and they take away your money. This is what really pisses me off when people go on about welfare recipients being lazy, criminal and/or immoral. Everyone should have to try to live on welfare for a year so that they'd know what the hell they're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. poor
Much has been said of the poor of New Orleans, but I don't see where conditions there were much different from Detroit, Washington, the Bronx or Chicago. New Orleans just happened to get the hurricane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Excellent question. It's pretty important to find out those numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Exactly. It seems like BushCo is using "poor" to mean "black."
There is a wide range of poverty in New Orleans, from the working poor homeowners to the projects, which are little more than concentration camps the government sets up to house the victims of our economy. Even in the projects there are a lot of working poor with families.

I've read a couple of articles suggesting that the plan they see for reducing poverty is just integrating society, which implies that being or acting white is a cure for poverty. And a lot of the homes that are being called "poor neighborhoods" are owned by working families, and are only poor because low property values and higher insurance rates keep living standards down. The property values are lower because they are in black neighborhoods. See the cycle? And because they are lower in value, it's harder to get home improvement loans to renovate, whether for minor repairs or major reconstruction.

New Orleans poverty problem is a racist problem, and so far it looks like the solutions will be racist solutions. Even Mayor Nagin says he won't let the criminals back in. How's he going to stop them--get Katherine Harris to make him a list? And what about the white collar criminals who run the insurance firms and loan industry that discriminate on race and make poverty worse? They destroy more lives and property than the petty street criminals he plans to keep out.

One Republican joked that Katrina had finally cleaned up the low income housing areas they had wanted to clean up, and that politician was loudly criticized for his remarks, but it's beginning to look like he was criticized more for letting the cat out of the bag than for any real disagreement with his statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Excellent post
You said exactly what I believed that the word POOR was really to mean BLACK. You identified the problem (almost) correctly. You left out because the neighborhoods are POOR they have little in the way of property taxes to improve the quality of education to stop of cycle of poverty and lack of opportunity. So the cycle will continue.
Do you KNOW NO? Can you identify which neighborhoods were evacuated housing (homeowners) of working poor families?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I don't know it that well
My parents grew up in New Orleans, so my memories of it are as much about visiting relatives scattered throughout the city as of any of the tourist stuff. Many of my relatives were older, and died off during the early 80s, but I remember visiting them in their neighborhoods and listening to them complain that the neighborhoods were being taken over by black people (not all of these relatives were nice, obviously). But some of the neighborhoods were the black neighborhoods of today that were flooded. I played in them, I walked their sidewalks. I remember some of the houses very well. They were very old neighborhoods. I asked my mother after the hurricane where some of these houses were, and many of them were in the flooded disricts. These weren't rental areas, people owned the homes.

But I couldn't give you the locations. I just never learned the names that well, and since I never drove to them, I have no instinct on where they were.

On taxes, I live in Texas now, and they've been under court order to not base educational funding on the property taxes from that district, but to have a more equitable plan. The plan still sucks, but it sucks more evenly than before. I'm not sure who New Orleans funds its school district, but when the public schools are mostly for those who are poor and underpriviledged, they are not usually funded well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. A BIG problem not specific to NO
BUT when you are in the South, Black and un/under educated it become a true hardship, FEMALE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD> HOMEOWNERS

Male householder, no wife present
4,070

Female householder, no husband present
16,118


RENTERS

Male householder, no wife present
4,723


Female householder, no husband present
30,053





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. That's the very essence of the difference between liberals and conservativ
Conservatives see stats like this and want to change the reality to fit the structure they know how to deal with. They want to "encourage" fathers to stay with mothers so we don't have female householders without husbands present.

Liberals see stats like this and we want to change the structure that prevents these households from being viable. Eliminate gender inequality in pay. Provide day care assistance so single parents can work. Provide assistance to get single parents on their feet until they can get better paying jobs. Be creative.

Liberals deal with realities, conservatives with fantasies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Last time I addressed this I created a firestorm!
Simply stated, STOP having all these babies! Liberal or conservative I don't think it is the obligation of society to pay for YOUR children,when you chose to have them. Yes, I accept there are some tragic circumstances when you do everything right and it turns out badly. When you have no education, no way to support your children STOP having them. I don't want to deny anyone the experience but have ONE not 4. I have no problem helping you to get an education after the marriage breaks up to get on your feet. I do have a problem when you are raising several kids and you don't TRY to help yourself, and expect someone else to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Why would you post this?
I can understand why you created a firestorm. This sounds like something from Ronald Reagan's tirades of the 1980!

First your post is not directed to a DU audience, but to some unknown person who has "lots of kids." I only have one child so I know you aren't speaking to me.

Second, regardless how many children people have, we are going to pay taxes for schools, infrastructure, etc. to keep these children safe and healthy, regardless if they are kids on ADC or the millionaire's kids in the next county.

Third, when women have adequate health care and access to reproductive services, then you will see a decline in the birth rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I posted it because I truly believe it
Of Course we pay taxes for schools. Unfortunately. the underclass (parents) have lousy health care and so do the kids. EVEN IF they had access to reproductive services many LOVE having big families, regardless of their lack of opportunity for the future.
I have no kids. I respect that you only had ONE!. I don't see how it is LIBERAL to pander to the underclass, tell them it is ok to be irresponsible and have as many kids as they want regardless of whether they can support them??


PLEASE Tell me how this helps anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Well, then, you either have to pass strong laws limiting the number of
children a person has, or bury your head in the sand as to the way reality works. What penalties do we give to mothers that have more than the accepted number of children? Imprison her and take the kids? Just take the extra kids? Who raises them? We don't save money because we have to pay someone to raise them. Forced sterilization? Do you trust your government enough to give them control over who gets sterilized? Talk about ethnic cleansing.

Or you can take the Republican route. Complain that things aren't the way you wish they were, and turn your back on reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Obviously none of your suggestions are acceptable
To give woman access to birth control, educating them not to have more kids than they can afford would be wise. I'm sorry, I still have no idea WHY liberals continuously defend irresponsible behavior.There is a different between TRYING not to and NOT trying at all. IN MOST CASES birth control works. After you have had your children (1 or 2) tie your tubes or the husband should have a vasectomy.All that is done is we perpetuate poverty by having too many children you can't afford. BTW this is NOT a racial statement. We have as many whites in poverty as minorities that do this.

This maybe YOUR reality,isn't mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. It's not a matter of defending; it's a matter of understanding that it
happens in spite of my personal disapproval.

I too believe that no one should have more children than they can support. For that reason I like the idea of free birth-control for whoever wants it. But other than that, what can I do about poor people who want a lot of babies? Not much.

Yeah, so people *should* have their tubes tied after a couple of kids. But unless we make a law that says they must, there will be a lot of cases where that doesn't happen. So should people live in poverty and misery because of bad planning? Even if they "deserve" to be poor because of this, I still don't want to live in a country where babies starve and families are camped out on the street.

That's what jobycom means about dealing with reality. Yeah, we can wish it were different, but we have to deal with what actually happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. WISHING has nothing to do with it.
I'm 55, I'm my day teen agers did not walk around with a preganant belly. IF you got pregnant you were sent to Aunt *(*&^* house far away. It is now acceptable, in some cases a badge of honor. SHAME is a good thing. It keeps us from doing stupid SH*T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Liberals DO do that
Liberals do provide birth control education, better access to medical care, etc. It helps, too, but it doesn't eliminate the problem. So you still haven't answered what you do when you try everything you just said, and you still have the problem. Starve the kids? Arrest the parents?

That's the issue. The problem will exist. You can provide education on the issue, and as liberals always show when we're in power, it helps. But it doesn't eliminate the problem. And a lot of families don't plan to be single parent families. A lot start off with good intentions and then wind up in that situation anyway.

The best solution is to accept that this is the reality, and plan around it, through government assistance, through creative ideas, through dropping pig-headed and false ideas of the way things should be and start dealing with the way they are.

Again, better day care systems for single parents, equality in pay so that mothers don't make 60% of what fathers make, education and job training, etc, are ways to help people survive in the reality in which they live, instead of telling them they should have done something different.

And it is a race issue, too, because of the inequality in pay, in hiring, in firing, in promotions, in education, in health care, in property values, and even in law enforcement. Blacks and Hispanics come out on the short end of those equations every time, so the problems are exacerbated for them. Not to mention that with the wealth restriction on black families and the history of denying wealth to black families in this nation, the wealth of the black community has not been able to catch up with the wealth of the white community, so that where a white family might have the resources to care for their derelict children, black families more often don't.

The problem won't go away by telling people to behave. No society has ever found a way to make all of its citizens behave. That's why they had exposure in ancient times, and monasteries in medieval times. To get rid of unwanted children. So we could use their solution and go back to abandonment and exposure as a solution, but that just doesn't seem right, to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Working poor
you are right - there needs to be some statistics to set people straight.
I like to remind people when they show disdain for the working poor that that is who will be changing their diapers in their old age!
To say nothing of the many other low paid positions that everyone depends on to get through their day.

Katrina exposed prejudices that are way out of date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Go to the following Census site...
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 02:26 PM by JanMichael
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Bad link BUT I found this
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 02:39 PM by serryjw
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=16000US2255000&-qr_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_DP4&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&-_lang=en&-_sse=on


Interesting facts.Keep in mind that this is from 2000 census, the economy has gone down the tanker since then

51,435 NO VEHICLE!

Lacking complete plumbing facilities
1,856

Lacking complete kitchen facilities
1,900


No telephone service
8,292

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. It works now. You beat my edit.
Anyway on the right side of the data you'll see "MAP". By hitting this on "HomeOwners" you'll get a census map by block group, block and/or track.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Newsweek has a long cover article on poverty in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Education will always be the solution to poverty
It does not have to be college educated but a trade that will lift the NEXT generation out of sub standard existence.Unfortunately the NEXT generations do not get the benefit of the American dream. They just continue the cycle by dropping out of HS and not acquiring a trade. This is NOT specific to NO>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yep, it looks like they lumped everyone together...
renters and homeowners. So now ol * is going to have a lottery so some will get back homes that they already OWN and some will not! :sarcasm:

Hopefully the homeowners will be able to prove ownership before * Co steals their property! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
finecraft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Story about a family I "adopted" at the local evacuee shelter
Their names are Latonya and Michael. They are both in their mid 30's, and they have 4 girls. They evacuated to New Iberia before the storm. They stayed in a cheap motel for 4 days, then moved in with a relative here in town. (This relative now has 20 people from New Orleans living with them)They are looking for a house to rent so they can start their lives over. They both worked at Antoine's Restaurant in the French Quarter for almost 10 years. Michael started as a dishwasher, then got promoted to a fry cook, then an inventory control position. Latonya started as a clean up/prep person, and was promoted to the inventory order/ receipt department. Care to know how much Antoine's paid them? Keep in mind, they both had been there almost 10 years. $7.50 an hour. Yep...one of the signature restaurants in the Quarter, a place where the cost of one meal for one person easily cost over $100.00, paid loyal 10 year employees $7.50 per hour. (They did not share in customer's tips, or they would have been making $2.15 per hour) And it's not just Antoine's. This is the dirty-little-secret behind cities that base their economy on tourism. The tourism industry pays its employees crap. These people had never taken a penny of public assistance in their lives. They were embarrassed that they had to go register for food stamps. They were lease/purchasing a home in New Orleans and raising 4 children on $7.50 an hour. Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Thank you for pointing this out
$7.50 an hour after 10 years of employment -- and inventory control is generally considered a skilled position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. When you lose your job, you ARE a deadbeat
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 05:42 PM by SoCalDem
Especially when you still OWE the money you owed before you lost your job.. (republican thinking)

as long as you can keep all the plates spinning, and never ask for help, they are ok ...but if you have an unforeseen calamity befall you, and you need temporary help?? Hah!. You'll get a handful of warm spit, and a lecture about how you should have "planned better".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
22. This is an interesting question....
I remember hearing some report on the news. And it made reference to people who couldn't evacuate because they had not gotten paid yet. They were not scheduled to receive their checks until like 2 days after the hurricane.

When I heard that, I didn't know if they were referring to your "first of the month" folks, or if these were State employees who were not scheduled to get paid until like that Wednesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Both, I think
There were also many people -- hotel workers and such -- who reported being told that if they didn't show up for work on Monday (the day Katrina hit landfall), they would be fired. Imagine being so desperate for a job that you would put yourself in harm's way to keep it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. That is totally disgusting to be threatened with being fired
Who could expect anyone except emergency personnel to report for work in such conditions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. Looking at South Mississippi
You have a huge amount of destruction of businesses on the beach. Casinos, tourist attractions, restaurants, hotels/motels and the Mall were all destroyed. So your freshly unemployed are wait staff, kitchen help, housekeepers, retail sales, casino staff - (the Hard Rock casino was a week away from opening. My son's girlfriend and my step daughter were going through orientation and ready to start work. Now they have to start looking again.)

All vital members of society, but most on a paycheck to paycheck existence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
30. One of the most profound comments I heard within days of Katrina ...
... was one of the women stuck at the Convention Center. She looked right at the news camera and said, "We pay taxes to this government, and this government won't even help us."

I think some of these Reich-wingers want to convince rich white people that the displaced of Katrina are a bunch of bums who just want to sit around looting stores and taking government money. Well, guess what? These ARE working people who DO pay taxes, with the expectation that when something catastrophic happens to them, that their government will snap to and help them with their most basic needs and protection.

We all pay taxes. The Bush Crime Syndicate ... er... "Administration" uses that tax money for an immoral war. Then sits with its thumb up its butt while people who pay those taxes die starving and parched in a pile of garbage. None of us can never be secure in the knowledge the gov't will take care of ANY of us when disaster strikes.

I will never let go of my rage against this Bush bunch. Never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC