'The Beltway Nazis' on Faux - on the Sept. 24 protesters in D.C.:

[Lori Price CLG]

"These people are pro-terrorism, and these people are pro-Saddam. The media may not report it that way, but that's what they are." :rofl:

Lori Price

[deutsey]

1. So the disinfo campaign begins...

[Arkana]

2. Yep. Sure.

Every one of those protestors is a terrorist. Hello 1984.

[StellaBlue]

9. Yeah

Does that mean they can shoot us?

[Arkana]

10. If it does, then we can sure as hell shoot back.

Liberals aren't all "peace and love" anymore, wingnuts.

[dooner]

3. guess those creeps will say anything to keep a paycheck n.t

[cry baby]

4. I saw that. I try to steer clear of faux, but happened to be

flipping through and heard them talking about Cindy Sheehan.

[StellaBlue]

5. Uh-oh

They've figured us out!

I hope they don't try to stop me from eating some Belgian children and getting six abortions on my way to the protest!

:rofl:

[TheStates]

6. Well that was easy. We now know who the real nazis are...

Thanks for blowing your cover, Fox! :eyes: :eyes: :eyes:

Do tell how many fake shows the Faux News fourth reich is going to be broadcasting now.....

Actually people who stand up to them should be proud to be labeled communists. After all, it puts the finger out in daylight who the true communists are.......with their fox cameras guarding the house.

[ThoughtCriminal]

7. Digging in?

I have to wonder if Fox knows that they're well past the peak and just wants to entrench with the core Bush cultists. OK, it's a shrinking audience, maybe even a niche by the time it hits bottom, but the advertisers love a gullible market.

[Raster]

8. Why do they hate the oil companies?

[acmejack]

11. Which one of those people said that?

Kondracke or Barnes?

[killbotfactory]

12. more than 50% of america want us out of iraq

didn't know so many pro-saddam/terrorist people existed in the US

[maine_raptor]

13. I detect a bit of wishful thinking here.....

Look at the quote:

"These people are pro-terrorism, and these people are pro-Saddam."

In reality, if anybody was "pro-terrorist" and "pro-Saddam" it would be our good friends at Faux. For without the terrorists and Saddam to kick around they would be just another tabloid "news" channel with better graphics that E!.


"The media may not report it that way, but that's what they are."

Aren't they (Faux) the media, so are they saying they're not going to report it, but just call it anyways?

Man these people are so transparent.

[UTUSN]

14. The Beltway Bozos Answered an E-mail a Couple of Wks Ago

Where I complained about the KONDRACKE bozo repeating the canard that Whoopi had profaned Shrub at a KERRY fundraising. I had heard her say she didn't, that she profaned him in her nightclub act. The bozo staffer "Michelle" responded that I should check my facts before I dare to criticize the on-air "talent" and she attached a CNN item from the period of the event saying what KON-bozo had said. I replied saying that I had HEARD Whoopi give her version on The View and that "reporting" is frequently wrong, like when the Brazilian was shot in London, and that it was arrogant for her and her bozos to think they are above being criticized. I also told her not to respond any more and to get KON-bozo to face his own e-mail.

Oh, ja know that KONDRACKE re-married after his book tour where he sopped up sympathy and dollars about tending his now deceased wife's tens of years of debilitating illness.

[TheStates]

15. Weird.....these guys really are talentless hacks...

If they can treat their email viewers with such disdain they are beyond the pale of competent or compassionate conservatives!

[maine_raptor]

16. How much you wanta bet a suckup email would get a much different response?

[Raster]

17. Let's put this into perspective. In 2001, we were portrayed as the

left-wing lunatic fringe element against the rest of the country (why do they hate America?). It's 2005. Now it's the right-wing fringe element AND THE REST OF US. And every indicator, including Gallup's pathetic last attempt at bolstering bushco*'s numbers (they got called by Faux!!!), shows the clear and distinct majority of Americans disagree with and disaprove of bushco* and their resultant errors in judgment. In no uncertain terms, there are far more of us than there are of them.