Recommendations From Carter/Baker For Federal Election Reform
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 10:49 AM
Original message |
Recommendations From Carter/Baker For Federal Election Reform |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 11:19 AM by cryingshame
Very brief summary:
VARIOUS TOPICS * Uniform standards statewide * Voter databases interoperable across state lines * Provisional ballots uniform statewide with poll workers fully trained * Provisionals clearly marked/segregated and not counted til voters determined to be eligible * Having phone line for determining ones registration status and where voting takes place * Voter ID card *
VOTING TECHNOLOGY * Voter verifiable paper trail for audit * States should determine beforehand which is ballot of record (electronic or paper) * Audits- before, during and after election. Public observation
SECURITY FOR VOTING SYSTEMS * Independent Testing Authorities should have responsibility for certifying security of source codes. A copy of source codes put in escrow for future review. Manufacturers unwilling to submit source codes for escrow prohibited
RE ENFRANCHISEMENT EX FELONS *excluding capital offenders
VOTER/CIVIC EDUCATION *states begin instruct high schoolers
POLL WORKER RECRUITMENT *Pay scale higher to attract more technologically sophisticated workers *Open jurisdictions to outside poll workers to ensure bipartisan workers cause some districts one party
RESPONSIBLE MEDIA COVERAGE *Networks give 5 minutes every night in month leading up to election for candidates' debate *Free air time to candidates
NO MENTION OF INDEPENDENT FIRMS DOING EXIT POLLS TO GUARD AGAINST FRAUD!
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Voter Verifiable PAPER TRAIL FOR AUDIT! YES, YES, YES! |
|
VOTING TECHNOLOGY * Voter verifiable paper trail for audit * States should determin beforehand which is ballot of record (electronic or paper) * Audits- before, during and after election. Public observation
NOW, who will listen to this? :(
|
BOHICA06
(886 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message |
2. How about positive ID ... |
|
at the polls; and during registration, citizenship documentation?
|
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. it's in there. long document w/many recommendations not listed in my brief |
killbotfactory
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Republicans will never go for this |
|
It would the vote much harder to rig.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Jan 13th 2025, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.