Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers Opposes Baker/Carter Commission Report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:16 PM
Original message
Conyers Opposes Baker/Carter Commission Report
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usnw/20050919/pl_usnw/conyers_opposes_baker_carter_commission_report__discriminatory_id_requirement_will_make_it_harder_for_tens_of_millions_of_citiz

To: National Desk

Contact: Dena Graziano of the Office of U.S. Rep. John Conyers (news, bio, voting record), Jr., 202-226-6888

WASHINGTON, Sept. 19 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Rep. John Conyers, Jr., ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee and founding member of the
Congressional Black Caucus, issued the following statement opposing the Baker/Carter Commission Report on Election Law Changes, released this morning:

"I am shocked that this Commission has decided to take us several giant steps back in the march for voting rights by recommending a national ID requirement for voters. This would inevitably disenfranchise minority voters and the most vulnerable among us -- those who live in poverty and the elderly. While I continue to believe that the 2004 elections showed our desperate need for election reforms, this misguided and highly controversial recommendation makes this Commission's entire report -- regardless of the merits of other recommendations -- dead on arrival from a civil rights and voting rights perspective. As a result, I am unalterably opposed to these discriminatory new requirements and will encourage my colleagues in the House and Senate to join with me in doing so.

"The lack of a fair and open process like that used by the Carter-Ford Commission was evident throughout. In the last commission, civil rights groups submitted research, reports, and testimony. This time around, civil rights groups were essentially barred from the process. The only input from the civil rights community (Barbara Arnwine from the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law) was essentially ignored on this critical issue. It speaks volumes that the public could not participate in a process that would effect their most fundamental right, the right to vote. Moreover, the Commissioners spent only a short time deliberating on these issues.

"If they had spent more time on the issue, they would realize that there are incredibly few documented cases of voter fraud to even respond to via legislation. Essentially, the Commission would have us create a massive and intrusive new bureaucracy, and one that discriminates and disenfranchises, in order to deal with a non-problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bravo Mr. Conyers, let's not swallow any more bullshit. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Baker must have strong-armed Carter into signing off on that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't let Conyers sabotage Voter Verified Ballots. No Black Box Voting!
Conyers strategy is misplaced. Yes, the concern about fees for ID cards is real, but it can easily be won. Winning the Voter Verified Ballots issue is bigger and more important and hard to win. Don't let Conyers sabotage that effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC