|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 05:34 PM Original message |
Clark Was Not Clinton's General: An Inside Look At Clark Falsely Accused |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 05:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. It's really an incredible piece... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
2. Bookmarked, thanks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yep! Imagine: A general more concerned with protecting human rights... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomUser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 05:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. The mind boggles... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 05:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Sounds like one of them damn liberals if you ask me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. Love him or hate him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Nah. He's a mole for the BFEE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. ...and a deep cover one, too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. All the PNAC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. And he eats kittens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:20 AM Response to Reply #12 |
31. And his "defender" is an assistant editor for the TNR who led |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:22 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Michael Moore Michael Moore Michael Moore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:38 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. ignorant ignorant ignorant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:41 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 01:37 AM Response to Reply #39 |
44. You'll take Michael Moore as long as he's a useful tool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 01:40 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. I'll Take Anyone Willing to Help Take This Country Back From Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:43 AM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Wouldn't this be a logical fallacy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:44 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Stickdog Enjoys Making Those Types of Arguments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 01:39 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Here's how the argument goes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 01:55 AM Response to Reply #45 |
50. And there's where your fallacy is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 03:21 AM Response to Reply #50 |
52. I'm not trying to "prove" Clark is a neocon using the TNR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. My favorite (so far) is the person who posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MODemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 09:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. w h aaaat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 09:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. No... HERE it the best one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 10:33 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. I agree. That is too funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 10:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. It shows you how seriously the dem base takes the "scrutiny." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. You forgot - he's also the "establishment" candidate of Clinton... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. ooops! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Isn't he Chelsea Clinton's real father? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. No, he's the Stop Dean candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. And that Draft effort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:47 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Hey! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 06:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Wasn't it in with your "Shut down your website or else" letter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IranianDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 09:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. Clark is PNAC, murders kittens, and enjoys Michael Bolton! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 09:49 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Now HOLD ON! You take that Michael Bolton accusation back! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoopie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 10:37 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Now HOLD ON! You take that Michael Bolton accusation back! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 09:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Jiminy Fargin' Christmas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-06-03 10:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I think it's called "emotional release". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
30. WOW. The neocons at TNR like neo-Clark! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:21 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. TNR Isn't Pure Enough for You Either...But You Can't Explain Michael Moore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:34 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. What, the guy who endorsed Nader last time out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:40 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. It Showed Far Left Tendencies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 01:43 AM Response to Reply #38 |
47. Why does Moore think Clark is the real deal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 01:49 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. That Logic Seems Straightforward Enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 03:26 AM Response to Reply #49 |
54. Clark lobbied for CAPPS II. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
34. Another "incredible piece" by Spencer Ackerman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:39 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Perhaps it's just because I'm tired |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:51 AM Response to Reply #37 |
42. rowdyboy posted, just yesterday, a plea too DUers to verify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 12:59 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 01:47 AM Response to Reply #37 |
48. No, it was to show he was trying to quiet war opponents before the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 01:59 AM Response to Reply #48 |
51. I'm sorry, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-07-03 03:23 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. How about when he said that Powell's UN case was "devastating"? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC