|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
wakemewhenitsover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 05:09 AM Original message |
If Hillary wins in '08, how much presidential power will Bill have? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kenroy (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 05:11 AM Response to Original message |
1. Probably less than Hillary had from 1992-2000 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 05:12 AM Response to Original message |
2. How much Presidential Power does Laura Bush have? Sheesh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakemewhenitsover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 05:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. But Laura Bush wasn't President for 8 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-05 12:41 AM Response to Reply #2 |
25. He'll look lovely in the Chanel suit and pillbox hat though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 05:17 AM Response to Original message |
4. Hopefully 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibertyorDeath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 05:26 AM Response to Original message |
5. & why would Diebold ES&S & Sequoia Voting systems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladylibertee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 05:37 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Why? I will tell you why..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 06:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Someday there will be a female president. It will not be Hillary. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladylibertee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 07:00 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. We shall see.Noone ever thought Bush would make a liberal speech? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 07:18 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. He was lying through his teeth, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladylibertee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-05 12:35 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. He was not lying...He just did'nt want to tell the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibertyorDeath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 01:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. I would have tears of joy in my eyes if this became "reality." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Child_Of_Isis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 06:16 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Red states think women have their "place". eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladylibertee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 05:28 AM Response to Original message |
6. Quite a bit.But I would suspect, he will be hanging out a lot.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 05:29 AM Response to Original message |
7. Probably very little. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozymandius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 05:53 AM Response to Original message |
9. I am reminded of the deal that Reagan and Ford tried to make in 1980. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakemewhenitsover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 04:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. That's fascinating. Can you explain? How formal was plan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozymandius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-05 09:30 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. The plan was haggled in the back rooms at the convention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakemewhenitsover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-05 06:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Thanks. Really interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drifter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 06:16 AM Response to Original message |
12. That is the reason she will NEVER be president ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brmdp3123 (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 06:29 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Actually, I think the impression is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 06:34 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Yeah, most Rush listeners think that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
15. Why are you asking? 1) 2006 comes first, 2) This is a fav Reich wing Q. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Binka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Why Indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
16. Personally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Berserker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 07:02 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Well Said JNelson6563 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TallahasseeGrannie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-05 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
20. I think there is a better chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pepperlove (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-05 09:32 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. She has one vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-05 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
28. Won't happen. Moot point. If Hilary runs the rethuglicans will win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC