Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where can I find poverty rates as percentage of pop. under Reagan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:11 PM
Original message
Where can I find poverty rates as percentage of pop. under Reagan
BushI, Clinton, BushII ? Like in a graph form or year by year.

Not having any luck googling, and I'm trying to refute this OReilly BULLSHIT--

"In 1996, the poverty level in the USA stood at 13.7%. In 2004, the poverty level was 12.7%, so Bush beats Clinton here by a full percentage point. To be fair, Clinton did bring the poverty rate down during his administration, while it has been rising slightly since 9/11. But at the halfway point, Bush wins."

That's because Clinton was handed a much HIGHER poverty rate by Bush I. But I need to find what it was . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Media Matters deals with the issue
http://mediamatters.org/
but, sorry, I don't know where graphs are

On his nationally syndicated radio show, The Radio Factor, Fox News host Bill O'Reilly again compared the poverty rate at the midpoint of both the Clinton and George W. Bush presidencies to argue that Bush has more effectively alleviated poverty in the United States. Ignoring the overall trend lines during their respective White House tenures, O'Reilly claimed that comparing the 1996 and 2004 numbers is the "only fair comparison" and the "only accurate measuring stick." But as Media Matters for America has noted -- and as Radio Factor caller "Larry" repeated -- such a comparison obscures the more relevant fact that the poverty rate declined every year of the Clinton presidency and has increased every year under the Bush presidency
-more-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Under Clinton, poverty dropped from 15.1 to 11.8 percent:
Edited on Tue Sep-20-05 12:20 PM by SteppingRazor
Since Congress passed President Clinton’s Economic Plan in 1993, the poverty rate declined from 15.1 percent to 11.8 percent last year — the largest six-year drop in poverty in nearly 30 years. There are now 7 million fewer people in poverty than in 1993. The child poverty rate declined more than 25 percent, the poverty rates for single mothers, African Americans and the elderly have dropped to their lowest levels on record, and Hispanic poverty dropped to its lowest level since 1979.

http://clinton5.nara.gov/WH/Accomplishments/eightyears-01.html


On edit: It should be pointed out that the poverty rate, really, has hovered around 12-14 percent since LBJ's War on Poverty -- before that, it was in the low 20s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. See:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Another Bill C. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Census information
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Okay, great, thanks all
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another thing to consider is what income levels were used to determine
"poverty". Those have been manipulated over the years - there'd be more people living in poverty if the poverty cut-off line had kept up with inflation over the years (as well as if it had taken into account that what families pay for insurance now is a bigger chunk of their income).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC