|
Democratic and Liberal internet sites have come to be a major source of funding for Democratic office-holders and seekers.
However, there is a divide between what we (the internetters) and they (the established politicos) want. They want job security, we want out of Iraq. They want to move toward "moderate" positions. We want ALL OF AMERICA to move to a more LIBERAL position. We want the deficit and debt reduced, they want more pork.
How else do you explain the hawkishness of Lieberman and Hillary Clinton? How else do you explain the idiocy of the DLC calling for increased military spending?
They want to look tough. They want to bring home the bacon. They want to be seen as reasonable.
We recognize them as being pale chickenhawks, pork-seekers and treasonable.
There are arguments being made about not "cutting and running" from Iraq. There are equally strong arguments to be made that is exactly what we should do. Our leaving Iraq will make Iraq more stable, not less. We are a destabilizing element there, not a stabilizing one.
There are arguments being made about the necessity of military spending and bringing federal money back to your constituents. There are stronger arguments to be made that in a time of record national debt, your constituents will understand the need for frugality.
There are arguments being made that Democrats must shed their image of being 'too soft' or 'too dovish'. There are stronger arguments to be made that by enabling the President in his overseas adventures our Democratic leaders are committing treason.
Our leaders had better start getting more like us and they'd better start advancing our arguments, or they'd better get used to less money and more opposition from the real democrats on the internet.
One man's opinion.
|