Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBV: some interesting common ground between us and "them."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 10:54 PM
Original message
BBV: some interesting common ground between us and "them."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/995894/posts

-snip-

There should always be a paper trail in something this important. Paperless voting will eventually lead to some very strange situations. It is just a matter of time. The decision-makers have been razzle-dazzled by the high-tech advocates and the hardware/software salesmen, or worse, some of them may be knowing-participants in the scam.


6 posted on 10/06/2003 3:51 AM PDT

------------------------------------


Activists are demanding that ballot machine vendors include printers that produce paper receipts so citizens can confirm that paper results match their touch-screen choices. Receipts would go into a county lock-box for use in recounts.

For the life of me I don't understand why we would accept anything less. There has to be SOME paper trail!


7 posted on 10/06/2003 3:56 AM PDT

------------------------------------



There isn't. After 20 years of voting with punch cards, and never a problem with chads, we switched to touchscreen computers in the last election. *Zero* paper trail.

My state rep seems concerned, and now seems to understand the issue, but there also seems to be a "well, we spent all this money, we can't go back" attitude.


8 posted on 10/06/2003 4:00 AM PDT

------------------------------------



Face it folks, many of us don't have the intelligence to nod our collective heads up and down to signify yes, never mind touching a computer screen to vote.

It's time to go back to the piece of paper and draw a picture of the guy or gal you are voting for.

Don't worry if the election officials will recognize who you have drawn.

They are trained professionals and will decipher it for you.


9 posted on 10/06/2003 4:01 AM PDT

-snip-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I noticed this a few days ago
The folks at FR have the very same concerns we do. And that's about as far as I want to go with that thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'll go a bit further: The potential for an uncommonly broad coalition...
...to make auditable voting systems mandatory should be exploited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It is a basis for a coallition
which shooud not be missed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Gmta, G_b_n_c!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Some of 'them' appear to be smart enough....
..to know that a system that can be rigged is a weapon that can be pointed both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BevHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. One of the first posters at the forum at BBV.com
(not a very active forum at the time) is a computer scientist from Free Republic who has corresponded with me off and on for several months.

It is a mistake to think this is an issue controlled by party lines. A more accurate way to conceive of it is like the campaign finance problem -- Republicans tend to get more money, more benefit, but Democrats also get dirtied by a poor set of election laws.

Bev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC