Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you want to investigate "Able Danger"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:23 AM
Original message
Do you want to investigate "Able Danger"?
Even if, the Clinton Adminsitration is guilty of covering up the Mohammad Atta story before 9/11 ever happened? If it reflects poorly, very poorly on the Democrats, do you still want to know? Do you still want to investigate? Should partisan politics be put aside and let the investigators get to the bottom of this? Or do you think it is a setup to hang the Clinton Administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. my God is truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. It doesn't matter. We already know that the FBI were not looking for
people to take over planes with box cutters. And they were not expected to be suicided.

We also know that Bush was more interested in iraq. And that Clinton handed off a battle plan to Afghanistan because they had just prooved that the USS Cole was done by Al Qaeda.

Does't matter.

We knew some of those people were on a 'watch' list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Whatever...bush administration is hung because of the PBR
A month before 9/11 it said OBL was determined to attack the US. The Twin Towers were a target and they were looking at hijacking airplanes.

How much more of a warning does anyone need?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Absolutely! Let the chips fall where they may.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. No problemo.
It appears the Pentagon stuffed the stovepipe. I think the truth is going to find that there were some neo-cons running their own agenda in the Pentagon....let's not frget that Reagan/Bush/Cheney/Rumsfield were well represented inside the government during Clinton's tenure. PNAC (led by Rummy) were already articulating the plans for the ME and that a New Pearl Harbor would be needed. I suspect that 9/11 was a long time in the making and uncovering one of the star players would not have been in the interests of the neo-cons who were not yet ina position to put the plan into action.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. I want the truth
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I_Make_Mistakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Truth trumps all. Let the chips fall where they may. I'd rather
know if Clinton knew before 2008, if you know what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. There is no doubt in my mind that Bill Clinton
was not told of this. Bill Clinton was intensely interested in keeping this country safe not only for moral and ethical reasons but also because of political reasons. Republicans would have unleashed all of the media they control on him had he behaved the way Bush did on 9/11. Clinton would have been forced to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corgigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Of course
I'm not a republican and can handle if Clinton screwed up. As long as I get the facts without spin.

No one should ever have to decide to either burn to death or jump out off a 100 floor window.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
artemisia1 Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yes, I want it investigated. Just not right this second. Let's get through
Edited on Thu Sep-22-05 01:54 AM by artemisia1
the aftermath's of Katrina and Rita first. Normally, I'd say the two, recovery and investigation, are not mutually exclusive but politicians have proven that they can only concentrate on one thing at a time and our country is facing catastrophe on an historical scale. Sure President Clinton could have, and should have, done more against OBL in the 90's; however, he was NOT President on September 11, 2001.

FREEPERS, you do know that Clinton wasn't President on 9/11, don't you? You do know that Iraq was not behind 9/11, don't you? You do know that Hussein was a secular dictator and not an Islamicist, don't you? You do know that the greatest expansions of Federal power and spending (read deficits) have occurred under Republican administrations, don't you? If so, why the HELL are you still FREEPERS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. But it's not damning to Clinton
Clinton never even heard about Able Danger. True, it could point fingers at some people in office during his term, especially in the military, but that's different.

See this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4846388
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. Democrats are the Truth Party, Republicans are the Power Party
I'm for truth. The Democrats should pay a little more attention to power, but you don't have to ignore truth to do that. Truth triumphs in the end, but sometimes it takes a while.

Find the truth and let the chips fall where the may. The country will be stronger for the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Malloy talked about this tonight
and how certain powers in the Pentagon
kept this information from going up the
chain.

I would certainly like to know more about
this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC