Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has anybody seen the pilots of the JetBlue incident? Are the veteren

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:41 AM
Original message
Has anybody seen the pilots of the JetBlue incident? Are the veteren
piolets. Young, old? They sure did one hell of a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kept it right on the center-line
pretty good piloting I'd say......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. The pilot did admit he was 6 inches off of dead center...
Edited on Thu Sep-22-05 11:59 AM by reformedluddite
Never mind the fact that the line must have been 3 feet wide. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd bet they are a lot older today than they were before the landing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Reports of the cockpit conversations with the pilot...
...were that he was cool and relaxed throughout the entire ordeal.

Next time I fly, I want THAT one flying my plane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Did an excellent job!
They definetly earned their paycheck last night, and hopefully a nice bonuse as well.

I would love to see a picture of that runway up close there. From what I saw on television, it looks like the nosegear etched about a six inch deep groove the entire length of the runway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Airbus engineers deserve a pat on the back too.
I can't imagine the stress on that front landing gear assembly - but it held up perfectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Wasn't it the back gear that held up
and the front gear that was messed up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well I mean for the front gear to withstand the stress
of being landed on in the state it was in.

I doubt the gear problem itself was something they can be blamed for - how many A320s are in service and when has this ever happened before?

More likely a maintenance issue or just "one of those things."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Thanks - now I understand what you meant - eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I imagine the engineers and mechanics are sweating right now...
... trying to figure out what went wrong. Or else they already know, and are still sweating...

I hope it was something entirely freaky, like maybe a bird hitting exactly the wrong place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yeah, what caused this in the first place?
And I understand this is the second time this has happened to the same type of airbus.

I don't think the engineers deserve a whole lot of praise here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Are you kidding?
Hey, Airbus! You're undercarriage assembly failed, but you did one hell of a job building it!

------

There's a reason people in the industry call it "Scarebus"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Designing systems to withstand failure
is a sign of good engineering. We don't know yet if it was a design or maintenance problem, nor do we know if the same engineers who designed the part that may have failed also designed whatever kept the gear from collapsing during the landing. Either way, I'm just saying, it could have been a lot worse and thankfully it wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, I'd like to see that too
I kept waiting for the cameras to take a long shot of the runway but they were too focused on the people leaving the plane.

I always admire a good bit of airmanship and these guys were good. Some of the reports were that they were very, very cool, calm and collected during the whole incident...even joking with the passengers over the P.A.

Good people all the way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Kudos due all round.
... except for spelling :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC