Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's Time For The Democratic Party To Stand Up For Gay People

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:39 PM
Original message
It's Time For The Democratic Party To Stand Up For Gay People
And I don't just mean more words in a platform.

I mean, leading Democratic figures such as Clinton, Kerry, Edwards, Biden, Dean, etc. must explicitly and vigorously react to the ongoing demonization of gays by the Republican right and by conservative churches.

This latest action by Pope Benedict only mirrors and reinforces the ongoing hate campaign waged by the Republican party in the United States.

A hate campaign that will not be defeated by having a "civil dialogue" that "respects" people's "religious beliefs systems." Religious belief systems that engender and breed hatred are NOT morally equivalent to belief systems, religious or otherwise, that engender equality and dignity and justice. Religious belief systems that teach that one set of people are somehow superior to another should be forcefully attacked as dangerous, bigoted, fundamentalist and profoundly un-American.

I don't want to hear the word "tolerance" come out of any Democratic politicians mouth ever again. I don't want to hear about treating people with "compassion."

I want to hear about "full human rights," and "respect."

I don't want to hear about compromising away marriage rights in favor of patchwork civil unions or domestic partnerships.

I want to hear how civil marriage rights foster permanency and commitment and stability, all rock solid American values, and how those rights and privileges should and must be extended to all who wish to honor them.

And I want to hear a little anger and eloquence.

We are your brothers and sisters and we deserve no less. And if we lose some Southern votes because of it, oh well, they weren't worth having in the first place.

I maintain we will gain FAR more votes from the vast, neutral middle who respect politicians who bravely and courageously stand up for strongly held values, even if they don't specifically agree with all of them.

It's long past time to stand up and do what is right. The whole world is watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. democratic party inc take a stand???? ummmmmmm ->
quite a few have on the glbt issue, particularly howard dean. I am sure we can name others if we think really hard...you know, hard work.

then again might not wanna make those catholics mad by criticising the papa.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/political-shirts.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not a big fan, but John Kerry
voted against the DOM act, when up for reelection. He also told Bill Clinton he wouldn't back the anti gay initiatives during the campaign. I trust him on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. On the marriage thing. The State should get out of it all together and
Edited on Thu Sep-22-05 09:52 PM by cryingshame
give out and require only civil contracts for any two people of any persuasion who want to join households. Oh, and forget bothering with the civil ceremony in front of a judge. Since when do contracts require a 'ceremony'?

Let Marriage be the word refering to spiritual bonds and let each church decide who they'll allow to marry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Absolutely perfect answer....Get the state out of the marriage business...
Let individual churches marry whomever they like and be a spiritual bond. A civil union contract requiring signitures and witnesses should be all the state requires of any two adults wanting to join together, and it should carry all the benefits and penalties currently carried by "marriage"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. no doubt but
...er...pope benedict?

i am not aware that it is the business of the democratic party to tell the pope what to do, the pope is not to my knowledge an american citizen

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Your plan will succeed
if it combines efforts in a campaign for "full human rights" and "respect" for women, people of color, all those who are The Other-- in a mass movement for social justice.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Or not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Yes. It will succeed or it will not. More true words were never spoken!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. While equal rights is indeed one issue
the specifics of each group are entirely different. Women are discriminated against in a different way than blacks or hispanics or gays and lesbians.

And even though we still have institutionalized racism and sexism, we have changed the laws to ostensibly grant women and racial minorities full and absolute citizenship.

Not so with gays and lesbians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. There is more common ground than you know
I'm very interested in where, or if, the gay rights proponents are aware of this. It's seems a huge blind spot.

They are all the same issue. Your cut-and-dried response is why the illusionary door b/w them is wedged shut.

The divisive approach may work. Previous civil rights successes have come from affected groups working together.

This statement seems really short-sighted:

"...the specifics of each group are entirely different. Women are discriminated against in a different way than blacks or hispanics or gays and lesbians."

A riddle for you-- what is the common theme? What is the purpose of keeping each "specific" group down?

The CA Legislature passed a gay marriage bill. The Gubernator vetoed it. Is the divided strategy working?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babyk Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. I disagree
in terms of priority, this is not at the top of the list of important issues.
We can wait until Dems are back in power before wasting energy and time on these issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Assuming
you're not just trolling, which I think you are, it's pretty sad that anyone would think that human rights are a waste of time.

Maybe in your country. Not in mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phusion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. How about the Greens
or some other party...

And why doesn't the Black Caucus and Dennis Kucinich move away from the dem party. The dem party is lost, IMHO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Stand up for gay people ?
Don't hold your breath. It's a major task to get the Democratic Party to stand up for anything nowadays, except for the rare Senator or Congressman here and there. But, when was the last time they stood together for anything as a Party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Mayor Gavin Newsom totally gets it
but he's light years ahead of the national Dems. You're right, unfortunately. They triangulate and follow polls so much they end up standing for absolutely nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. ITA, either they believe in civil rights or they don't. I'm sick of it.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC