Why is CNN giving equal air time to a few hundred war mongerers?

[NotGivingUp]

[Chi-Town Exile]

1. Because Rove Told Them Too

[CitrusLib]

2. To please the corporate weenies who sign their paychecks?

[Botany]

3. Why did they change exit poll data @ 1:00 AM on 11/3?

They are in Karl's back pocket.

[joanne]

4. Are they covering this TRASH?

Better not be!

On edit: back to hurricane coverage

[StClone]

9. I AM GLAD THEY ARE!!!

EXPOSED! THE SHAM OF EQUAL SUPPORT IS AS OBVIOUS AS THE PICTURES OF THE FEW AT THIS NONEVENT...yes I am yelling with delight at C-SPAN's coverage inadvertent or not the story is being televised!

And Bush's flyover was not coincidental! Rove is da' bomb.

[Salviati]

5. So they can be "fair and balanced"

You know, because as long as reporters present "both sides of the story" then they're doing their job. Nuts to the truth...

[adarling]

8. i like what bill maher said about fair and balanced

its not possible, because sometimes one side of the story is right and the other is wrong, there is no balance and there shouldn't be, that is called objective reporting. We need OBJECTIVE reporting! :)

[tjdee]

6. Aren't they gettingmore time?

I didnt see anything about the anti-Iraq war march yesterday on CNN.

[Jack Rabbit]

7. To ward off charges of being part of the biased liberal media

That's the way the biased corporate media operates.

[ChairmanAgnostic]

10. fairly unbalanced. Hmmmm 300,000 vs 300.

but those 300 happen to own stock.

[seabeyond]

11. are they getting equal air, because i saw nothing on msm about

the peace rally. only am hearing about presenting the anti peace rally.

[leftofthedial]

12. that is their job

propaganda for the war-making machinery