Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 10:42 PM
Original message
Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=KEE20050925&articleId=994

Suspicions Strengthened by Earlier Reports


by Michael Keefer

September 25, 2005
GlobalResearch.ca

Does anyone remember the shock with which the British public greeted the revelation four years ago that one of the members of the Real IRA unit whose bombing attack in Omagh on August 15, 1998 killed twenty-nine civilians had been a double agent, a British army soldier?

That soldier was not Britain’s only terrorist double agent. A second British soldier planted within the IRA claimed he had given forty-eight hours advance notice of the Omagh car-bomb attack to his handlers within the Royal Ulster Constabulary, including "details of one of the bombing team and the man’s car registration." Although the agent had made an audio tape of his tip-off call, Sir Ronnie Flanagan, chief constable of the RUC, declared that "no such information was received" (http://www.sundayherald.com/17827).

This second double agent went public in June 2002 with the claim that from 1981 to 1994, while on full British army pay, he had worked for "the Force Research Unit, an ultra-secret wing of British military intelligence," as an IRA mole. With the full knowledge and consent of his FRU and MI5 handlers, he became a bombing specialist who "mixed explosive and … helped to develop new types of bombs," including "light-sensitive bombs, activated by photographic flashes, to overcome the problem of IRA remote-control devices having their signal jammed by army radio units." He went on to become "a member of the Provisional IRA’s ‘internal security squad’—also known as the ‘torture unit’—which interrogated and executed suspected informers" (http://www.sundayherald.com/print25646).

The much-feared commander of that same "torture unit" was likewise a mole, who had previously served in the Royal Marines’ Special Boat Squadron (an elite special forces unit, the Marines’ equivalent to the better-known SAS). A fourth mole, a soldier code-named "Stakeknife" whose military handlers "allowed him to carry out large numbers of terrorist murders in order to protect his cover within the IRA," was still active in December 2002 as "one of Belfast’s leading Provisionals" (http://www.sundayherald.com/29997).

Reliable evidence also emerged in late 2002 that the British army had been using its double agents in terrorist organizations "to carry out proxy assassinations for the British state"—most notoriously in the case of Belfast solicitor and human rights activist Pat Finucane, who was murdered in 1989 by the Protestant Ulster Defence Association. It appears that the FRU passed on details about Finucane to a British soldier who had infiltrated the UDA; he in turn "supplied UDA murder teams with the information" (http://www.sundayherald.com/29997).

Recent events in Basra have raised suspicions that the British army may have reactivated these same tactics in Iraq.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. When ya go on a picnic...ya don take bloody bombs.....
That Bombs were in fact found....this was no picnic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, were they? Anyone see any solid reports they did?
Wouldn't be shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Even the normally inquisitive British press has been avoiding that question
Which I have found strange. Especially knowing the British media knows about the past dark history of their military very well.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tower Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. I suspect they were there to assassinate someone in the insurgency.
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 12:52 AM by Tower
Or I should say someone "suspected" of being in the insurgency. You know- something like Operation Phoenix from the Vietnam era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. That Seems A Pretty Good Guess, Sir
Welcome to the Forum, by the way....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tower Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Thank you very much.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes.
Of course they were. What else would they be doing with all that crap while in disguise and then having to be blasted out of custody with flipping tanks then spirited away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neweurope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. But certainly. Do YOU dress up as an Arab and grab an anti-tank weapon
when you go for a stroll?

--------------

Remember Fallujah

Bush to The Hague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC