Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

--- IMPORTANT CONTEXT: Another reason Aaron Broussard is so upset

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:24 AM
Original message
--- IMPORTANT CONTEXT: Another reason Aaron Broussard is so upset
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 09:42 AM by Armstead
There is usually more to situations than meets the eye. Aside from reacting to the obvious devestation, Aaron Broussard was probably resisting saying a big "We warned you but you didn't listen" when Katrina struck.


From his bio on Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Broussard

Broussard was president of Parishes Against Coastal Erosion (PACE) and in a June 14, predicted: "With the National Hurricane Center predicting another active hurricane season, PACE President Aaron Broussard said he fears that it is going to take a major storm and significant loss of life before the nation acts responsibly..."


--------------------
Here's that press release. (Note to Mods:This is a press release so copywrite doesn't apply, and am including the whole thing)


http://www.americaswetland.com/article.cfm?id=241&cateid=2&pageid=3&cid=16

Press Releases June 14 2005
Parishes Against Coastal Erosion (PACE) Response to the Bush Administration's June 14, 2005 Policy Statement on the Proposed Energy Act of 2005

By Parishes Against Coastal Erosion

Scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey, NOAA and other federal and state agencies along with university experts agree that nowhere in the world is a coastal region losing wetlands and protective barrier islands faster than Louisiana. About this there is no doubt. It is predicted that by 2050, one third of coastal Louisiana will have vanished into the Gulf of Mexico. Our coast and its wetlands is a system on the verge of collapse. Without wetlands to buffer storms, our people and property and the nation's energy supply are at risk. Oil and gas pipelines and facilities, which provide 25% of the Nation's energy needs, are more vulnerable with each storm. Oil and gas activities and federal actions to control the Mississippi River for navigation and flood control are largely responsible for the drastic loss of our coastal. PACE believes we are completely within our right to ask the federal government to share money generated from offshore oil and gas revenues with the coastal states that bear a disproportionate burden in supporting this nation's energy needs.

Louisiana's congressional delegation has urged Congress for more than a decade to return to the state a fair share of the revenue from the production of offshore oil and gas both because of the impact of offshore production on Louisiana and because interior states get 50% of revenues from oil and gas production on federal lands.

The president has supported the concept, but has backed off when it comes to funding the restoration effort. PACE believes Louisiana can no longer afford to wait. Louisiana urgently needs guaranteed resources to thwart a catastrophe that is not being given the sense of urgency that it demands.

We believe the case has been made. Louisiana's wetlands - America's WETLAND - is crucial to the nations oil and gas production, commercial fisheries, navigation and commerce and national security. Restoring the damage hastened by years of inland and offshore drilling is clearly a national responsibility.

The President, in this Policy Statement, has failed us. To sidestep this as a key issue would be a serious deficiency, in the Energy Bill, and the entire nation will suffer as a consequence.

Our Louisiana legislature this month passed a constitutional amendment requiring any new offshore oil and gas revenue to be put in a trust fund dedicated to coastal erosion.

Louisiana has made a commitment. Now, it's time for the President to step up to the plate and support funding to prevent the untold damage to the ecology, economy and potential loss of life in large numbers.

With the National Hurricane Center predicting another active hurricane season, PACE President Aaron Broussard said he fears that it is going to take a major storm and significant loss of life before the nation acts responsibly.

The PACE organization's frustration with the Administration's Statement was reflected in St. Bernard Parish President, Henry "Junior" Rodriguez's comment that "Louisiana contributes much to this Nations energy needs. It's time we take a hard look at our alternatives and consider whether we want to keep up this level of oil and gas production."

If you have any questions, please contact Jefferson Parish President and PACE President, Aaron Broussard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. And * punished them by not declaring those parishes
disaster areas before Katrina struck for the following demand on the oil industry:

"Our Louisiana legislature this month passed a constitutional amendment requiring any new offshore oil and gas revenue to be put in a trust fund dedicated to coastal erosion."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbajai Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yesterday I had a revelation about Broussard.
Okay, bear with me here. Now I believe *'s lack of response with Katrina was purposeful. It was to send the message that government will not and cannot help you in a time of disaster. It was to create such a horrible - mind-bending situation (Psy-Ops) that people will be forced to think differently. Therefore, * is probably happy that Broussard is saying that "Bureaucracy murdered people." Because it's what * wants them to think. Why??

Read today's Washington Post article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/25/AR2005092501224.html?referrer=email&referrer=email
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree and disagree
I don't think govt. lack of response was purposeful. Instead I see it as the logical of this administration's focus on stripping government services down and a logical consequence of right-wing policies and crony caspitalism.

But I do agree that, like after 9-11, the administration looked for ways to capitalize on Katrina to expand the military side of govt. and advance it's real agenda of crony capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. just the lack of not being aware and concerned that disaster might happen
was the problem pre and post katrina.



......I don't think govt. lack of response was purposeful. .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think Broussard managed to stay "on message" perfectly...
Disparaging those who are hating and blaming without the facts - and it will be a while before all facts come to light - as divisive and ignorant opportunists, seeking to turn Louisiana's tragedy into political capital...

He's pretty entertaining, and I, for one, was surprised at just how articulate he was in defense of all those who are working so hard to help the victims...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. He does seem like an interesting fellow
Came up with a lot of obscure historical and literary allusions.

I must admit that his obsession with "buring at the stake" seemed a bit odd. It could be taken a number of ways. But I'll assume that wasn't meant to be taken literally.

Would be interesting to learn more about him in non-crisis mode.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. "Burning at the stake" is as relevant today as during the 1600's.
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 01:54 PM by 8_year_nightmare
The modern phrase equivalent is "You're either with us or against us."

If you're not "with us", we'll figuratively burn you at the stake by assassinating your character.

Broussard's use of that analogy told me that he must have a lot contempt for this administration's McCarthy-like attitude bottled up inside. So do I, because I got it right away.

Edited to add: Thanks for finding & posting the information about Broussard's commitment to coastal erosion. He's not only an interesting person, he's genuine. He's been a community leader for as long as I can remember. You won't find any black marks against him. Under better circumstances, he's a very congenial & likable person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. We can say "He told you so", for him. Nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks. I think the context is important in the Big Picture
Gov. Blanco issued a similar release this summer about the same issue.

She invited Mr. Bush to visit the coastline at the time to "educate him" about the problem. But I guess Mr. Bush was too busy mountain biking at the time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thethinker Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Our infrastructure is deteriorating
Our tax dollars are not being spent to make needed repairs on the infrastructure.

Last night the local television station mentioned how old and weak the dam is on Lake Livingston. They were worrying about it not holding the flood waters.

The federal tax dollars that should be used to maintain the infrastructure are being used to make wars and make Haliburton richer.

The country is starting to fall apart from lack of maintenance.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC