Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Hussein offer to surrender prior to *'s disaster?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:45 AM
Original message
Did Hussein offer to surrender prior to *'s disaster?
I'm calling Chimp's war on terra The Great Disaster War of 2003.

I remembre seeing somehwere in DU that Hussein offered to surrender prior to the war. I'm arguing with a very stupid freeper (and winning, naturally)..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, there was an offer through a 3rd party
It was a big story in the NY Times. It was 100 times more legitimate than the debunked Osama's head offered to Clinton on a platter 3 times by the Sudan, as the person that conveyed the info about Saddam was a legitimate gov't representative, and not a Fox News correspondent like Mansoor Ijez (sp?) from the Sudan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not that I've ever heard of. I don't recall anything to that effect being
said. (oh shit, that sounded like Reagan talking about Iran Contra . . . except I'm being honest and he was . . . being Reagan).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. all freepers are very stupid and debate only encourages them to be more
more stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah but sometimes you just have to rile them up for the fun of it
I like to get them going, stay calm and present the facts.
Every time they are presented with undeniable facts, they change the subject or bring up Clinton or Teddy Kennedy. It is a laugh every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. personally i would like to tie them up and torment them with a sharp stick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here is some info
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5172.htm
Saddam's desperate offers to stave off war

SAme story, but direct link to The Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1079769,00.html


And here's an Iraq timeline with chronology present to past:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/page/0,12438,793802,00.html

Hope this helps! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. The last offer I heard about (a week or less before the invasion)...
...Was that Saddam would go into exile somewhere, and Iraq would hold new elections.

The US said, 'no way', and scrambled for the excuse that the entire Ba'ath party had to go also now (which isn't what the US had said only a few months previously).

Like when the Bush admin continued to turn down the Afghanistan government's offer to turn over bin Laden in lieu of us invading, there was nothing that was going to stop Commander Bunnypants from starting his war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yes but that would not have guaranteed that American Corporations
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 11:20 AM by applegrove
would have had a say in how business & oil fields were divided. Not that Saddam would have had an actual 'real' election. Nobody is stupid enough to believe that. But the UN then would have had to go in. You know - with a force of 600,000 and UN procurement laws which would mean the insurgents would have had the option of going into business for themselves and no option to start and insurgency.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. you mean there would be no work for Halliburton?
the whole war/Saddam was a sham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. UN procurement laws say that the contract for rebuilding has to
go to locals first. So there would have been a stampede of foreign money of all kinds to get with an Iraqi and do business. Sunnis too. All that rebuilding money would have come from corporations & governments all over the world.

I'm sure Halliburton would have found a way to do business.

Point is that Sunnis would have not had the option of insurgency since the American Generals plans for an invasion with 500,000 at least would have been followed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. What I remember.
Bush had issued him a deadline to surrender, or be invaded. Well, Saddam being Saddam missed the deadline, but when he realized our military really was heading for Iraq, he offered to surrender then. Since it was past the deadline Bush said no way and invaded. Now I'm sure there are archived articles out there that can prove this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. In his national speech before the attack, Bush
publicly gave Saddam and his two sons 48 hours to leave the country or be invaded.

If he wanted to leave, he would have left.

At the time on DU, I was typing as loudly as I could that at the last minute Saddam would fly to Saudi Arabia and take the castle next to Idi Amin's while he planned his comeback.

I remember it clearly because I was so sure and so wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. Surrender - no
But he did offer to step aside and hold elections within 6 months I beleive. It was through a third party - and the US failed to acknowledge the offer. I think that is how it was - going directly from memory...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC