Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Terrible report from Creole LA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:06 PM
Original message
Terrible report from Creole LA
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 04:06 PM by MyPetRock
70% of residences destroyed. Many dead animals, farm and wildlife. Some looking imploringly at the reporters, as if asking 'can you help us'. CNN reporter says what they saw is very, very disturbing. Rita was a horribly destructive cane. Glad some of the truth is coming out.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Real sad n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are you talking about people who have returned to look
at their homes? I don't have cable. Thanks for any details you provide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This was from a reporter on CNN.
They didn't talk to any residents. Maybe none are there. It's a town of 1,500. Apparently the devastation in LA is very bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks.
I saw a photograph of a town that really wasn't there anymore. You could see straight lines which used to be streets. All was mud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. People really do need to think about the possibly catastrophic
consequences before they build in these coastal wetland areas. Levees are proving to be completely unreliable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Two words: Rice, and seafood.
People live in places like this so the rest of us can have things like that.

It's a life they choose, and they know the risks... not that that makes it feel any better to them. But it's a niche, and someone is going to live there. It's not as though it's densely populated, anyway.

As for N.O., one word: OIL. Well, also the simple geographic fact of the strategic location of the city, being on the mouth of the Mississippi. People are going to live there, too, in much greater numbers.

Half of California is on similarly catastrophe-prone land... but we really don't need to go there, do we?

People need to think about proper protective easures wherever they live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. So...their land is flooded and the water is polluted...what are you
suggesting. And, NO, these people didn't know the risks...their levees haven't broken before and this came AFTER Katrina passed. How the hell do you get your cows out? Houston had trouble evacuating cars.

I think being rural people they've had to know about alot of protective measures just to live where they do. So, you want to blame them by lecturing about people needing to think about "proper protective easures? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. People don't always know.
Think about this. Manhattan is on "solid" rock. So they said. A few years ago, I found out their is a fault line running east to west.

So, did Manhattanites knowingly choose to live along an earthquake fault? No, but we live here, and we're not moving.

When someone buys a house, s/he thinks about affordability, accessibility, size. How many people check for a history of natural disasters? Probably not many.

We all know about California and earthquakes, but I'll bet we really don't know much about other neighborhoods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I know. Maybe our government should regulate more where people can live.
I don't have any answers. I just think these tragedies are going to be much more common with global warming on the march.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Perhaps real estate agents should be required to tell
potential buyers about the neighborhood. "By the way, this is a hurricane area..." That sort of thing.

You know that real estate agents and sellers would resist such a requirement. It would interfere with sales.

So, once again, money will triumph over people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. There is no guaranteed safe place to live.
CA - quakes, mudslides, wildfire
Northwest - quakes, volcanoes
Rockies/Midwest - wildfires, drought, tornadoes
Central - drought, tornadoes
Northeast - blizzards, ice storms
Southeast - hurricanes

And yes, with global warming, each of these will get worse.

Get your survival kits & emergency/exit plans in order!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
choicevoice Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The people in the lower Parishes did not just build there.
They have been inhabitants of this land since they were thrown out of Nova Scotia. The Acadiennes or Cajun people had to settle on land that other people did not want. They came with nothing and made their living off the land. A large part of the problem is coastal erosion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC