Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yes, Scotty said "Rebellion" but the context is other than I thought...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:35 PM
Original message
Yes, Scotty said "Rebellion" but the context is other than I thought...
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 04:36 PM by mcscajun
It's still telling, though, that when they're challenged on not using the laws/statutes already in place to get the job done, they refer to the Insurrection Act.

From the White House Official Transcript of today's Press Briefing:

Q Earlier today you said the President was thinking of suggesting trigger power for the military to take over in the most severe catastrophe. My question is, would he bypass our constitutional civilian rule over the military to get that kind of authority?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, there are some laws that are already in place. You have the Insurrection Act, which was originally passed I think back in 1861. The President had authorities before that to quell rebellions or restore law and order if needed. But that was primarily -- the purpose of that act was really aimed at what I just said, quelling rebellions or restoring law and order. What we saw with Hurricane Katrina was a category five hurricane coming up the Gulf Coast. I think it hit as a category four. But this was a major, catastrophic event, and that's what the President is talking about, a situation like Hurricane Katrina. Is there a trigger needed, an automatic trigger for something like a hurricane five --

Q Wouldn't that be dangerous? After all, there is a --

MR. McCLELLAN: -- for something like a --

Q -- precedent, isn't there?

MR. McCLELLAN: Let me -- that's why I'm trying to go through this to talk to you about his views and his thinking on this because it is one of the important lessons learned of Hurricane Katrina. And the President is talking about what do we do in the event of a major, catastrophic event when we need to quickly deploy large amounts of resources and assets to help stabilize the situation. That's what he's talking about.

The military is the one organization that has the capability to quickly deploy large amounts of resources and assets to help stabilize a situation in the event of a major catastrophe.

Q But why bypass civilian control? You have instant communications, you can call the President.

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, we saw some of the problems from Hurricane Katrina. And this is one of the lessons --

Q Why? What --

MR. McCLELLAN: -- this is one of the lessons learned when you have a situation where state and local first responders are doing everything they can to help. But they're also victims. And to a large extent, they are overwhelmed. And so the question becomes, in a situation like that, how do you immediately or quickly establish some stability to help get people the help they need.

Q But can't you assume, then, that the President would know immediately if there was a severe catastrophe in the country?

MR. McCLELLAN: I'm sorry, what?

Q I said, wouldn't we assume that the President would know immediately that there was something terribly catastrophic?

MR. McCLELLAN: And that's why we need to look at this issue, because right now, the way things are set up, you have the Department of Homeland Security, which is from the federal government standpoint where you have a number of agencies under its umbrella that help assist the first responders. But it's primarily a state and local responsibility -- the initial response efforts, with the full support of the federal government.

And we saw with Hurricane Rita that there was very good coordination going on at all levels of government. And the response -- or the reports that the President was receiving that the response efforts were going well to get people the help that they needed and to save lives.

With Hurricane Katrina, you had a unprecedented natural disaster, one of a size and magnitude like we haven't seen before. It covered a very large area. And the President wants to make sure that we learn the lessons from Hurricane Katrina, and that means at all levels of government. And one of the lessons is, in a situation like this, do you need an organization like the military to come in and quickly stabilize the situation. They're the one organization that can do that, and that's what he wants Congress to consider.

Q They couldn't even reach the President during Katrina.

MR. McCLELLAN: That's false. That is absolutely false.

Q Well, then, isn't that the lesson --

MR. McCLELLAN: In fact, if you go back and look, the President was very engaged during that time period, including on the day -- the morning before the storm hit, when he was participating in a videoconference with federal and state and local officials, and the different -- in the region.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/09/20050926-2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Simple Scotty has a hard time keeping a train of thought.
ADHD? So the Insurrection Act will now be used to fight natural disasters? Riiiiiiiiigghht. Just remember, Scotty, all the power you steal away from US the people will come back to bite you in the ass one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. They're telling US what the lessons to be learned from Katrina are?
Am I dreaming this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Nope...you're not. Welcome to our Nightmare.
They explain it all to us. Really.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does this man even know what he is talking about....
after reading the above transcript, he sounds just like his boss. A lot of words with no meaning. Again, we have to ask - what the hell did he say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Only difference is, he's actually better spoken and can complete
his sentences. I do notice he seems to be having trouble saying some of this stuff though, like even HE can't believe it.

I can only Imagine the size of the ulcer he's toting around.

I predict he'll retire before the midterm elections "for personal reasons."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Was it one of Nixon's press secretaries ...
... that "they" would parade out to make "baghdad Bobesque" statements; much like Scotty (Deep down he must feel like a fool).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. You're right - it will be to spend more time with his family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. I had better hear something from Congress on this other than
the normal a$$ smooching noises we normally hear. What is wrong with these people? I want a vote incumbents out movement for both parties!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Eating cake and strumming a guitar is "very engaged"?
:eyes: bush didn't even acknowledge the hurricane until he was pressured into it by the Press, they he did his DARING "flyover" of the area and had such a good grip on the situation that everything went as smooth as silk from that moment on. :eyes:
Please, Scottie. Give us SOME credit. We're not ALL Republicans, you know? We're not that easily fooled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Hey, he's just trying to "catapult the propaganda", verstehen Sie?
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 05:15 PM by mcscajun
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. They've found a way to use Katrina's failings to their advantage.
Hats off to the asshats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Where is the National Guard in all of this?
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 05:40 PM by RC
Why is bu$h pushing the military? If the National guard was where it was supposed to be and with all their equipment, not nearly so many people would have died. The levees, assuming they had still broke, would have been fixed sooner.

What is it going to take to put this criminal administration in prison where they belong. They are profiting off of Katrina and Rita. They are also using the damage as an excuse to further gut the national treasury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. He's pushing the military because he wants to use the recent
disasters as a rationale to alter, override or repeal the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PowerToThePeople Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Put this criminal administration in prison
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 06:06 PM by PowerToThePeople
Did you mean,"put this criminal administration in front of a firing squad." ? Or is that just me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. No, put them in prison. To put them in front of a firing squad is to
martyr them to their followers. However what happens to them in prison is another matter. They will either be isolated or in with the general population. I hope for the later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. WTF? They're declaring war on God?
STP to Bushco: be careful who you make war with; you'll get far more than you bargained for if you pick a fight with the Almighty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC