Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Entire 101st Airborne Division Deploying to Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:35 PM
Original message
Entire 101st Airborne Division Deploying to Iraq
9/23/2005

Around 20,000 soldiers got their final briefing Friday afternoon at Ft. Campbell. It's been two years since the division was last deployed to Iraq.

Soldiers will board planes and be heading off Friday to do numerous duties, including helping train Iraqi law enforcement. Families took the afternoon to say goodbye.

This is just the 5th time in the history of the 101st that the entire division has been deployed all at once. The soldiers will be gone a year.

http://www.newschannel5.com/content/news/14622.asp



FORT CAMPBELL, Ky. -- Combat soldiers from the 101st Airborne Division will begin deploying to Iraq in the next week, two years after the division helped topple Saddam Hussein, Army officials said Thursday.

The Army is processing nearly 1,000 soldiers a day at Fort Campbell, about 50 miles northwest of Nashville, Tenn. as the 3rd Brigade ramps up to be among the division's first combat units to replace the Army's 42nd Infantry Division operating out of Tikrit in north central Iraq


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9259067/






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. On a related note ---
I was told while in DC * is recruiting Africans daily. They are signing them up simultaneously as US citizens. The man that told me this said they attempted to recruit his son this way. Can someone investigate this?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That can't be right.
Unless Congress has passed a law while I wasn't looking, military service...even completed...doesn't give citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This man said they were signing them up to be citizens and then
signing them up for military. He said he had proof, his son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, my dad has a story about the Navy.
It ends with a chief petty officer saying "Is THAT what they told you? Huh" and him serving an extra year.

That is, they might be told that, but I don't think they are getting citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, I think they get it posthumously

What a wonderful reward.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Whether or not they receive citizenship --- this needs checked
out for further proof of the back door draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. My thoughts, exactly.
Caveat emptor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. Greencard holders may enlist . Nothing new here.
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 06:37 AM by leveymg
Back in WWII, we granted US residence status ("green card") to Filipinos who fought on the side of the US against Japan.

Today, you have to already have a green card to enlist.

A green card normally leads to naturalization after five years. Persons in active duty status can naturalize several years earlier.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. I know they were doing that in some of the Pacific Islands, Guam, etc.
There were articles on it months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. Yes, it does and has for quite some time now
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 06:53 AM by Solly Mack
Bush's XO

http://uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/handbook/ExecOrd13269.pdf

"President George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13269 in July expediting the naturalization process for soldiers deployed in support of America’s War on Terrorism, said Murphy."

and prior to this XO, soldiers could obtaib citizenship for serving - but it took longer.

Clinton also handed down an XO expediting the citizenships of those who served in the Gulf War.


http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/n1/natrlztn.asp

The process of naturalization in some circumstances is shortened for members of the U.S. armed forces and for the spouses of American citizens, and there are certain exceptions made by means of private immigration and naturalization bills passed by Congress. In addition to individual acts of naturalization, whole populations may be naturalized. An example is the conferring of citizenship at various times in U.S. history on the populace of Texas, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

a search on google will verify this

also, I've lived on army post for over a decade - and I see it all the time.


the marginalized bet the chance of citizenship against dying as cannon fodder -

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
36. You may be incorrect about that
I have always been under the asumption that if you complete an enlistment in the US Military you are automatically granted US citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lowell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Wrong assumption
Citizenship is not automatic for veterans. They must apply and pass. Likewise citizenship is not automatic for children born of American parents in foreign countries. They too have to apply. Until they are of age they have dual citizenship and must make a choice upon reaching age. Military service simply makes the process easier, but not automatic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. I think probably what happened is
They signed him up with the promise to be a citizen. They do this all the time. It's an easy way to U.S. citizenship. You don't even need a visa or green card to join the U.S. Army. Just swear the oath, do your time, and you'll come out a citizen. If you die before your time is up, you're posthumously given citizenship.

Most likely they told him if the signs up to serve he'll be given citizenship. That's true. What they leave out is that he serves as long as they want him too and he can't leave voluntairilly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. We've Got ANY Troops to Send ANYWHERE? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. and what's going on in Iraq, that
20,000 are being deployed this week?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Turf war
Jets vs the Sharks, really nasty.

Actually, it's Shiites vs Shiites, a twist Bushco assured us could never happen.
Just when it didn’t seem like Iraq could get any worse—it gets worse.

This time, it’s the simmering battle between two Shiite paramilitary armies: the forces of the Badr Brigade, the 20,000-strong force controlled by the Iranian-supported Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI), and the Mahdi Army, the thousands-strong force that worships the fanatical Muqtada Al Sadr. The battle, which might flare into a Shiite-Shiite civil war in advance of the October 15 referendum on Iraq’s divisive, rigged constitution, could put the final nail in the coffin of the Bush administration’s Iraq policy.

http://www.tompaine.com/articles/20050922/badr_vs_sadr.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
32. the vote on the "constitution"
in October. Then it will be all peaceful and fuzzy in Iraq. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. For the Iran Invasion/Bombing?
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
31. my thoughts as well.
watch it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Civil Warriors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. that's an assault division
who are we assaulting again in Iraq? I can't keep them straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Iran and Syria ..... no sorry just the election in Iraq... me bad ...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, they've been deploying the 82nd airborne, as well. Supposedly, ...
... this is to have something to do with the totally fake Constitution ratification process.

I suspect it's one of two things:

1. These totally crazy neoconster imperialists are going to wack Iran (and Syria) -- big, big bombs in certain parts of those countries, and control of the Southern Iranian oil fields with these troops; or,

2. They are deploying these troops to cover a withdrawl. Becuase, given the (non-declared) civil war status that is Iraq today, when we start to pull-out, we are going to be shooting our way out, all the way to the Kuwaiti and Saudi Arabian borders.

Either way, it's a bad sign. But, I certainly prefer # 2 to #1 (and probably do most of our troops).


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cquik18 Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. What, AGAIN!?
Bush won't be happy till EVERY single SOLDIER is planted into the GROUND!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Is this a rotation? I don't see anything about it being a rotation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. anyone, 1 more vote for greatest page
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. kick for morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
19. So when exactly is the war aginst Iran starting?
that is my only explanation, and ..... *&*^^**&&&* one kid we know his unit is attached to the division... so I guess he is going
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
20. This looks to be the leadup to the attack of Iran.
The Bushies want it bad, and Congress has been giving them anything they want.

I wonder if this will be with or without a staged "Iranian" attack on us or some other target like an aircraft carrier or an Iraqi site to get the juices flowing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I wonder how many aircraft carriers we will loose to their
subs?

I guess it is time to break the back of the Navy, lord knows every other service is broken and the AF is quite untouchable... I wonder if and when the nukes will be deployed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. I wouldn't want to be an Iranian submariner.
I'd count their average life expectancy in minutes in the event of any war with the US.

Their mobile, land-based anti-shipping missiles are much less vulnerable.

A recently leaked CIA assessment says it will be a decade before the Iranians have enough nuclear materials, at present rates of production capacity, to build its first A-bomb. That is, if we don't provoke them into putting many billions more into their weapons program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. "The soldiers will be gone a year."
How long is a year in neocon dogs of war years? I always forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Many lifetimes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Oh man. Touche.
;(
Evil bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
27. It will be interesting to hear from these soldiers how Iraq has changed
since they were last there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sunkiss BlueStar Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
33. Oh my my my The Story
of the Arab dressin Brits must have been very inconvenient to TDITWH plans. Now they will have to up the clock on the Iran/Syria invasions. very very interesting :nuke: :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
34. Hey, I was just reading about Ashton and Demi's wedding - why are you
talking about this stuff when there is news that affects millions of TV watchers all over the world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
35. :^( Not good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
37. My oldest son was in that division. Glad he got out in '98.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
38. Combat Forces NOT qualified to train Law Enforcement!!!
Combat Troops are trained to KILL PEOPLE and Break Things.
They are NOT trained in Law Enforcement, nor should they be.
They ALSO should not be training ANYONE in Law Enforcement.
No wonder Iraq is in meltdown!

That would be like Brownie training people for Disaster Management!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
41. Oh, come on. People are fungible. You can have them here or there.
Rummy, the ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC