|
get this kicked:
Bolton may be the original leaker or may be one degree away from the leaker. He had an assistant when he was in the State Department who had access to the critical information. The fact that he was bold enough to see Judith Miller gives me a hunch that he may have ordered someone to pass on the information, but I can't believe he actually did it himself. That would be sheer lunacy to out himself that way. But, I would wait for another DUer to come out and confirm what I've written before repeating it.
The Plame-Wilson scenario has been around a lot longer. It's all about Iraq. Or more to the point, it showed that this Administration was willing to out a CIA operative, in order to silence someone that had information that shot down Bush's case for war in Iraq. And the Bush Administration WAS making a case for war. Remember he had Cheney in the CIA headquarters muscling the people in the CIA so they would only produce reports that supported his case. Cheney should never have gotten involved, but he did and the media allowed that one to slip by.
One of the most tangible reports that came out in favor of war was a document that is referred to as the Niger Report. It claimed that Saddam had "yellow cake" which is either plutonium or uranium, but we'll just say that it was an element needed to make a nuclear bomb. Therefore, the story that was pushed by the Administration was that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction.
That's where Wilson comes in. He had the proof that the Niger report was bogus. The Bush Administration swiftboated Wilson in order to make him less credible to Congress and to the American people. They started by outing his wife in order to shut him up. But they also tried to discredit him by claiming that Wilson, who was a Democrat, was being partisan and that his wife pulled strings to assign him the job that allowed him to question the report in the first place. That was bogus, but it did buy this Administration the time it needed to fool Congress and the American people.
Wilson, who knew his information was accurate, kept speaking out. He never stopped trying to tell his story, which is a good thing for us. But it really wasn't until after we went into Iraq and found no weapons of mass destruction that anybody really started to listen to him. In fact, it wasn't until the British Downing memo came out that people actually began to believe that the Bush Administration was "fixing" the data to create an argument for war. When you look at how far this Administration went to push for this war, it's hard to come away with any other conclusion but that they committed treason.
Finally, about Rove and the Espionage Act. There was a post which got it right. Gave the legal definition and did the walk through you're looking for, so I hope that someone kept it and will repost it for you. The conclusion was that, yes, Rove violated the Espionage Act.
But that's not what I think will be the source of the indictments for Rove. Fitzpatrick's schtick is perjury. From what I hear, his big thing is catching these bigwigs in a critical lie, and then making a case for perjury. I believe that is Rove's downfall. It's possible that Novak has already given the testimony that will indict Rove, and Judith Miller may be in there because this goes much further than Rove. Someone may actually be trying to find out if Judith Miller had anything to do with Kelly's demise in Britain.
But, now I think I've written enough to stoke someone into responding to your post and I would certainly wait until someone else confirms what I've written, before repeating it.
|