Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cruise Ships in N.O.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Esse Quam Videri Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:19 AM
Original message
Cruise Ships in N.O.
Latest bullshit no bid contracts for Carnival. Carnival got a contract for $250 million around $1,300 a person per week. They say this is not any more than they would make if the ships were in service. Well there is one difference. THEY AREN'T USING ANY FUEL!!!! Hey Carnival crooks your ships are in port not sailing out on the oceans using fuel. You must think we are all idiots!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. You can buy a ticket for $599 (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Plus those ships are only half full making the cost $2600/person
That also impacts meals server.
They don't mention meals but I assume they are serving maybe 2 meals a day, Breakfast and Dinner. That leaves lunch not being served and therefore there is an additional windfall for Carnival. And I am sure there are other services not provide that would add to the bottom line.

Yes they and the bu$h regime think the American people are idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. And here I thought Carnival was doing it out of the goodness....
of their hearts. When the story first came out that is how they made it sound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's what I had thought too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. You think they aren't using any fuel?
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 06:26 AM by Rabrrrrrr
Are you serious?

Not to say they aren't making a killing off this, but sheesh, criticize for the right things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Esse Quam Videri Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes I'm serious.
OK maybe using some for generation of power. But they are not using fuel for the propolsion of the ship as if they were sailing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Depends how hard their desalinization equipment is working...

...my guess is that could burn a lot of fuel. That is, if they have it and don't just tank up on fresh water.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Generating all that electricity, desalinization,
all the energy to run the kitchens, run the water heaters for the kitchen and showers and laundry...

Is it as much as if they were moving? No, of course not. But it's still a lot.

6-10 megawatts is the power requirement of the average Princess Cruise Line ship, and the Carnival ships are pretty much the same size.

So, they're burning fuel.

http://www.nrdc.org/air/pollution/ports/ports2.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Plus, no "floor show" staff to pay...
...at least, I wouldn't think :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
missingpeace Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. The ships are in port....
because FEMA contracted with the company to park them there for evacuees to use. Apparently they are charging what they could have made had the ships been taking people on cruises. If that's the case, then it's understandable. HOWEVER, as Keith Olberman pointed out last night, FEMA could have sent every evacuee that could have been put up in a ship, on a one week cruise to the carribean every week for six months for about HALF of the $250 million contract amount. Incompetent and stupid as one might expect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Esse Quam Videri Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Welcome to DU
My point is that they are saving a great amount of money on fuel. A cost that they would be incurring had these ships continued cruising the carribean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Hi missingpeace!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. Everyone was begging for the cruise ships a few weeks ago
It was a bad idea then, it's still a bad idea. People here on DU were screaming "Those rich bastards, throw them overboard, get those ships in there!"

Since Carnival is a publicly traded company, we'll find out if they made any profit on this venture as part of their 10k filings later this year.

IF they make little to no profit, then their corporate conscience is clean.

Oil usage is less, but power generation 24/7 still runs the engines. These ships use electric propulsion, so the engines still run even if the screws don't.

There is logistical problems like food delivery, mechanical, crew support (remember there are workers on these ships!), fuel, and cancellations of passengers and delivery contracts, etc. It would be cheaper if they were on their regular schedule, because all these issues are planned out weeks if not months in advance. It's JIT production (in this case, cruises) and you see the costs when the process changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. DAMN!!!
I always wanted to go on a cruise! I can't wait for the next flood here in West Virginia!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC