Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arnold for President in 2008? (read on!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 12:44 AM
Original message
Arnold for President in 2008? (read on!)
Edited on Wed Oct-08-03 12:45 AM by Cascadian
I know that newsmax is a freeper website but I had to post this. I have also heard this mentioned on Mike Webb's Show on KIRO last night.

http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/7/15/171016

http://www.lsj.com/columnists/andrews/030820_polcol_2b.html


President Schwarzeneggar????

Orrin Hatch must be kidding?


John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, seeing as how Reagan got elected.....
'nuff said :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Reagan 2....
Great! Yay! I can't wait.

Hold on...

:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sephirstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. NM
Edited on Wed Oct-08-03 12:48 AM by Sephirstein
Didn't read the article.

I don't even take Newsmax seriously when they write pro-Taiwan/anti-China stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wonderful
I can't think of any upside, this is a disturbing development. To make it worse, I bet he will pick Limbaugh or Hannity to be his vice president. Not to mention Coulter as national security advisor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Um, he can't run
Unless they change the law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Orrin Hatch wants to change the law.
aprt from this Newsmax and Lansing Journal article, I did hear something about it last night on the radio. What if it does pass?


John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zubeneshamali Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Right, even Coulter said the best thing about Arnold is
that he can't run for president. Unless those links up above detail some plan to change the law.

How about posting a quick summary so that we can decide whether to read the whole pieces or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. That's right...
he wasn't born in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well they ARE attempting to change the laws allowing
those who weren't born in America to be president.

Another fascist figurehead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Hitler was Austrian
yet he took over Germany, didn't he?


John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RummyTheDummy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. Changing the constitution is far more complicated than
some shit heel senator from Utah introducing an amendment. It's nearly impossible in this day and age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxycontinrush Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. Amendment would never get 2/3 in Congress or the States
I believe a Constitutional Amendment needs a 2/3 majority in Congress and 2/3 of the states to ratify. It wouldn't pass the Senate. There is also absolutely no way and hell 2/3 of the states would vote to allow "fur-i-ners" to be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. The anti-immigrant wing of the Republican Party won't like that
Of course Republicans only like immigrants if they are from Austria, Cuba, Korea or Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC