Massive coverup going on.
Sadly we are never going to know now what the scope of the violence was.
The people that buy into this latest version are complicit in the dishonor.
Let's peel back the fog and examine how this story has morphed.
One of the first detailed versions in print can be sourced to Brian Thevenot reporting certain bodies that both died from environmental and violence as fact.
http://www.nola.com/newslogs/tporleans/index.ssf?/mtlogs/nola_tporleans/archives/2005_09_06.htmlNow Brian Thevenot can be sourced to this latest round of new lower count findings: At the Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, just four bodies were recovered, despites reports of corpses piled inside the building. Only one of the dead appeared to have been slain, said health and law enforcement officials.
http://www.nola.com/newslogs/tporleans/index.ssf?/mtlogs/nola_tporleans/archives/2005_09_26.html#082732If you read both articles carefully, you will see that he is sourcing others for his conclusions.
Either way he has no business writing either of these articles.
but that hasn't stopped AP from picking up and running with both stories....Now CBS, and CNN have done the same.
He has no business writing them because if he wanted to know what the REAL story was, he could have gotten off his ass and gone down there and reported it first hand.
LIKE A REAL REPORTER
now we've all seen the TV camera reporters on scene at both the SD and CC. I have on video, evacuees telling the camera that there are bodies in there(CC).
so now the MSM expects us to believe that they never went in those buildings to verify those claims?
what a load of crap...
either they are so chickenshit they have no business on our TV screen...or they did go in and do not want us to know the truth(I'm referring here to the reports done while the crowds were still there, not afterwards)
Now I've searched all over for any first hand reporter's report(the reporter is the actual witness) and I've come up nearly empty.
I now think I know why.
One reporter did get into the CC to view the refrigerator.
This Reuters account gives us a clue as to the difficulty of that prospect.
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N03464940.htm "People here said there were now 22 bodies of adults and children stored inside the building, but troops guarding the building refused to confirm that and
threatened to beat reportersseeking access to the makeshift morgue."
He himself tells of the difficulty: As we walked past the Windsor Court hotel, we were stopped by a female state trooper. "Y'all came over here without guns? Don't go there. Don't go there unless you have a machine gun around your neck.
In another account he tells how he evaded checkpoints:
I began my day about 6 a.m. in the parking lot of a Waffle House in Baton Rouge, La. Daily News photographer Mike Appleton and I had slept in the car. There isn't a hotel room to be found from Texas to Arkansas.
We gassed up the SUV, fueled ourselves with coffee and headed for New Orleans. Police at a checkpoint turned us back - no media allowed, they said - so we pulled out the map, figured out some back roads with help from the locals, and shadowed the mighty Mississippi on our way into town.
and another:
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/24990/AMY GOODMAN: Can you describe how you got into New Orleans yesterday?
TAMER EL-GHOBASHY: Yesterday we got into New Orleans by trying our best to circumvent the various police checkpoints along the main interstate and the surrounding larger arteries. With the help of some local folks, we were able to use back roads that were at that point unmanned by police.
Having no Internet and phone in New Orleans, we are forced to go back to Baton Rouge in order to transmit our reports and our pictures. I'm with a photographer by the name of Michael Appleton, but today we got in. They had -- the back roads were manned. They were only letting in emergency vehicles, according to them. We found a way by doing something rather unadvisable, but we got here.
AMY GOODMAN: What was that?
TAMER EL-GHOBASHY: Well, we drove on the levee for a portion of our trip...
AMY GOODMAN: What is it like to drive on the levee?
TAMER EL-GHOBASHY: It's nerve wracking simply because you don't want to get caught, but otherwise there's plenty of room on it to actually fit a car across of it. It's designed to have vehicles drive on it, whether it be emergency vehicles or official vehicles or what.
AMY GOODMAN: Surrounded by water?
TAMER EL-GHOBASHY: No. No. The portions that - at that area are completely dry. The only evidence of the hurricane you would see are sporadic downed wires, downed trees, and maybe some signs ripped out of the ground. Things like that.
He perseveres
He was wary of the rumors:
"I was skeptical of the claim and a man took me to a massive refrigerator in the center's kitchen."
What does he see:
"Eight bodies were inside, though there was no power to keep the refrigerator on. I found the other two corpses around the back, on a loading dock.
The body of an elderly woman sat in a wheelchair covered with a red-and-blue checkered cloth. Her feet stuck out and had blood on them. Next to her was a woman wrapped in a white sheet."
http://www.nydailynews.com/09-02-2005/news/v-pfriendly/story/342770p-292645c.htmlSo there you have it...a first hand reporters account
Why is that being ignored for the newer accounts?
let's take a look at the OSS handbook on how to psyops an atrocity....
http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/oss/psywarmanualnotes.htm11.
What makes a good atrocity story. I am convinced that a large portion of the atrocity stories being used by the Allies, e.g. in BBC's broadcast in Arabic, are ineffective even though probably true. It may be that the confirmed liar can tell a more convincing atrocity story than an honest man. Atrocities are probably more readily believed when attributed to a group unambivilant hatred. Atrocities with precedent are probably also better. Effective atrocities should be poignantly presented, full of human interest stuff, of pathos or real horror. At the same time, there probably are psychological factors making a civilized person reject or fail to assimilate the full impact of the atrocities stories, no matter how true.
12.
Effective denial in propaganda. The propagandist should know how to effectively deny false claims or the true claims spread by the enemy. Some in use are effective, others pathetically inadequate. One hunch is to study the diversions that creep into the denial of an outright false-hood and the denial of something without a grain of truth in it. The propagandist should strive to make the denial of a semi-truth follow the pattern of a confidential denial of a clear-cut falsehood. One should not overdo the characteristics of the latter, however, at the same time one may want to purposely use ineffective denials in order to spread rumors and the like, thus, if we are trying to get a given rumor spread, an official statement that persons in power have no comment to make would probably lend popular credence to the rumor.
------------------
Everyone tries to pull the truth to their side, but more times than not....It lay somewhere in the middle.
Reports of the brutality, some feel, make the victims look like savages, Likewise covering it up dishonors the victims and lets the snakes slither away