Will John Roberts be a good Chief Justice - DU poll

[donheld]

http://www.cnn.com/

I say no!

[Nitrogenica]

1. UHG...anything with * hands on is gross!

[TallahasseeGrannie]

2. I'm clueless. No idea. n/t

[Wickerman]

6. Good for whom?

Good for America? Good for Corporations? Good for Televangelists?

Another bullshit CNN poll.

[Fenris]

3. WTF is this "yes" or "no" shit? Can I see into the fucking future?

[BigMcLargehuge]

11. A loss of rights... a lot of fights... many sleepless nights...

(rippp) What is the next 50 years with JR on the SC.

[tompayne1]

4. My hope is

he will be like david suitor.

[Mr_Spock]

5. How the fuck can anyone answer that?

Sorry, I turn my ESP off at 5:00 PM :D

[moobu2]

7. I have to guess no.

John Roberts was very slick and evasive in his answers to many very important questions and the White House wouldn’t turn over documents…I think he must be a Right Wing Nut case, some secretive RW-Republican think tank has groomed for years. Hope I’m wrong.

[beyurslf]

8. Hell no, but does it matter? He is there for 30 years or more now.

[Richard D]

9. He'll probably be a great Chief Justice . . .

. . . if you are a right-wing anti-choice * loving fool.

[goclark]

10. Needs serious work - keep kicked nt

[donheld]

12. Kick

Get busy DUing peoples

[mvd]

13. I'm negative until shown otherwise

Bush hasn't done one thing that surprised me in a good way.

[jmowreader]

14. He'll be good for someone

That someone's probably the same someone Rehnquist was a good Chief Justice for--corporations and the ultrarich.

Which is why we are so sorely in need of a good reliable swing vote, which was O'Connor's highest purpose.