Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just 'cuz ya like Jews doesn't mean you don't love the essence of Nazism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 01:36 AM
Original message
Just 'cuz ya like Jews doesn't mean you don't love the essence of Nazism
This simplistic argument is driving me nuts: Arnold goes out of his way to show how much he loves Jews, so therefore any of his admiration of Hitler must be completely false.

There was a hell of a lot more to the Nazi Party than just destroying the Jews. Ask a communist. Ask an abstract painter. Ask a homosexual. Ask someone with birth defects.

What Arnold said he liked about Hitler was his oratory. He also said that he loved the raw power of controlling others. The most chilling part of his statements on the subject was that there is too much individualism in America and that they need a strong leader.

The essence of Nazism was that it was Fascism: corporatism that elevated the moneyed and investor classes to the status of an unassailable nobility that controls the government, while destroying unions, trampling civil rights, marginalizing pluralists and demanding strict conformity. This is what Arnold liked about Hitler--along with the narcissistic thrill of the huge adoring crowd--and that's what's so scary. He likes fascism and he considers himself superior due to his powerful will and discipline; others are inferiors. This is classic Republicanism (personal superiority) and it's morally ugly. That's the true problem, and it's nauseating to have it dismissed just because he has no beef with Jews. That's got nothing to do with it. That's not even the issue.

It's bullshit. To excuse his love of macho thug dominance by saying that he isn't anti-semitic is ludicrous.

In a like vein, it's outrageous to hear the comparisons to his sexual pawing with the dalliances of Clinton and Kennedy. The issue is CONSENT. It doesn't matter what Clinton did; that was consentual. The primitive sex-hating conservative mindset just sees "ug, sex bad" so there's no distinction between hot mutual whoopee and aggressive, unwanted advances. CONSENTUAL. The issue is consent; the two types of incidents are not the least bit comparable.

What a stupid, stupid world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not only that (though that's a lot)
but who in their right mind, when asked to name people they admire, puts Hitler at the top of the list--oh, not because of what he did of course, but because of the way he spoke, that nice young man. I mean, come on! If someone tells you casually that they admire Hitler for anything, aren't you thinking "Nazi!"? Of course you are! Unless you are a Nazi, or don't care if someone's a Nazi or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. People who admire power for power's sake are trouble in many ways
They will sell themselves for popularity. They tend to commodify other people, since they're all inferiors. They feel invincible and entitled.

The philosophical dangers of this kind of mindset are the true issues, and to dismiss the allegations just because certain parallels don't exist are simplistic. But then, this was the essence of simplicity, and is further evidence of the facile nature of mankind.

The good thing about Schwarzenegger is that he doesn't have a diabolical plan; he is pure narcissism, attempting to justify his value to mankind with a strutting butch vigor. Hitler had a plan.

In a way, Arnold's a true follower in need to be treated like a leader; it's a common performer's dementia. He's dangerous because he will be controlled by others, but mercifully his ego will not let him be a total tool.

Even putting aside the worry of the future and the other political implications that will resonate for a while, it's just a disgusting example of human shallowness to rally to this dick. What's there? Nothing. Fine showmanship. Nice opportunism.

Now it's time to fuck him mercilessly. It's the lady or the tiger, and I hope it's Roy's tiger. If he wants to bellyache about the lack of fairplay, then he's a snivelling little sissy. It'll be hard to hide now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC