Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So does this mean that Libby is taking the wrap for Bolton?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 02:05 AM
Original message
So does this mean that Libby is taking the wrap for Bolton?
One would think that Cheney's number one guy would be more important than Bolton, but who knows?

What the hell are they up to?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Anybody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Miller has been planning this move all along.
Who knows what she got from the Repubs for going to jail, but it's probably more than what she got for promoting lies about Iraq.

In any case, she's not important.

Bolton visited Miller in prison. He's connected somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think Miller is very important.
I think she's a career criminal of the lowest order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, and by god, prosecute her. But she has zero power really
The people with power work in the administration (at least they're on the books).

I'll watch with fascination any prosecution of Miller. She's a criminal of the highest order as far as I'm concerned.

But - unfortunately - there are bigger fish to fry here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsUnited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe. There's an interesting sentence in today's NYT article...
"Bill Keller, the executive editor of The New York Times, said that Mr. Fitzgerald had assured Ms. Miller's lawyer that "he intended to limit his grand jury interrogation so that it would not implicate other sources of hers."

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/29/politics/29cnd-court.html?pagewanted=2&ei=5094&en=ab3e643986deb5a5&hp&ex=1128052800&partner=homepage

What this means, I have no idea. Other sources in the Plame investigation? Other sources in general (because Fitzgerald was after Miller's sources in another, unrelated case).

Hmmm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. More like being thrown under the bus for Rove.
Lets face it. When you have both the top advisers for the President and Vice President at the center of the conspiracy you have the President and Vice President at the center of the conspiracy. My guess is that Libby will be made the fall guy. He'll be labeled a "rogue" staffer, who told Judy Miller, who told KKKarl, who told Novak, who confirmed it with Libby. Leaving Rove and Bush a couple of steps removed from the initial outing or so they hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'd say he's taking the rap for Cheney. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC