Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

possible new swing states for 2004

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:26 PM
Original message
possible new swing states for 2004
Cal
Arizona (Dem governor)
Kansas (Dem governor elected last year)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I doubt Cal
I doubt California and Kasas are swingers...and California? Bush may get a couple more percentage points (like 2 at most) but that's it. I'm sure they hate him out there and the Democrats will just use the same strategy that the Repukes used during the recall.

However, Arizona looks good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. the strategy used during the recall didn't work
but no action heros will be on the ballot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meti57b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. still, where I was hoping to coast through the 2004 elections in .....
California and do long-distance volunteer work and financial contribution in states more in need of it, ... it now looks like we are going to need to do a full court press in California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Montana is one ....
Edited on Thu Oct-09-03 02:32 PM by hadrons
a lot has been written about the energy rip-off there, but GOP de-regulation has been almost as bad there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Even with the Heavy GOP Turnout in CA for Arnold
Edited on Thu Oct-09-03 02:33 PM by XanthaS
Fox News' poll indicated something like a 50% approval rating for Bush* among those who showed up to vote.

On edit: I think that was actually a "favorability" rating, rather than a job approval rating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sephirstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kansas?!?!?!?!?!
Is that supposed to be a joke? (But then again, look what the GOP won during the Raygun years.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. if the repukes seem to think Arnold as governor can give Bush Cal
its possible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. It'll never happen in Kansas
Sure, they elected a Democratic governor last year.

But her opponent was a tub-thumping hard-right conservative who said that he would oppose increasing state funding for education at the outset of the campaign. The footprint that left on his dick never went away, and had faded only slightly by election day.

Besides, Kansas only has six electoral votes, hasn't voted Democratic in a presidential election since . . . . wow, I can't even remember when. I do know that they haven't elected a Democrat to the Senate since 1932, which pretty much tells you all you need to know.

Now Missouri, on the other hand, swung narrowly to Bush in 2000, has eleven electoral votes, strong Democratic bases in St. Louis and Kansas City, and has lost more manufacturing jobs since 2001 than any other state. That's your target.

Kansas? I seriously doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Repukes took control of the Missouri legislature in 2002
Holden is weak gov, has been overriddenat least twice

if the Democratic base comes out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yeah, base is key there
If McCaskill challenges Holden in the primaries, you're looking at a scenario where Democrats may get active and vote in large numbers.

The Puke Legislature in Missouri hasn't exactly covered itself in glory with its handling of the budget, and the job situation continues to suck big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Holden is taking the blame for the budget
the legislature hasn't set funds for a primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. The money is there
There's a stipulation in HAVA that requires them to spend as much $ on every election as was spent in 2000 (the most ever spent on any election). It allows for a small surplus. There is enough money to fund primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. She will
She's raising money to do it. I'm already seeing some yard signs, too. The Dems BETTER get active. Otherwise, we're going to get stuck with Matt Blunt. The puke leg has been very clever about tying Holden's hands so that he takes the blame for the damage they do. The media has served as a willing partner in crime. It's going to take some work to enlighten the general public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I don't think you are correct
but I have to leave, was just checking in. I will try to put the stats up later or tomorrow. There are lots of Repubs here but I have not heard too many who are crazy about Bush*. It is possible. From my experience here a democrat with a good agricultural policy could swing things. Kansans are a strange lot and could easily switch to a solid democrat. Just my take. Also, I have not studied the trends here. I am in eastern Kansas, western Kansas could be totally different but again, current farm policy is killing them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. California not a swing state
Especially once Ah-nuld proves he's better at explosion movies than at vanishing mammoth deficits without tax increases.
BTW, I strongly recommend Greg Palast's most elightening column on Arnie's chumminess with Ken Lay et al and why the idiots that voted for him in California can forget about ever seeing a cent of the money the energy companies stole from them.
http://www.gregpalast.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. I definately think that WV will go blue next year
and California won't be a swing state

Arizona may be, and with the right nominee, we could put states like Oklahoma into play
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. My guesses
of states that are somewhat likely (40% or better?) to go next time for a different side than they went last time.

Florida
Arkansas
Pennsylvania
Wisconsin
Minnesota
Missouri
Arizona
Oregon

This is all assuming a close election. If Bush wins or loses by 12 %, then lots of states will change sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. I think Oregon will stay Democrat
We've suffered a pretty awful economy, and we have very high voter turn-out every election due to our system of all Vote-By-Mail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not Kansas
Kansas has not vote Dem since 1964. The state is heavily Republican. No way in hell will it be competetive. Clinton never even came close to winning and Gore lost it badly.

If Kansas is even remotely competeitve next year then Bush is losing badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. As A Corollary
if * winning CA he's on his way to winning 40 + states....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. Forgot One
You forgot West Virginia. The only thing that took this state to Bush in 2000 was the threat of gun control. As long as that is not an issue then this state votes Democrate. In fact there is a great deal of respect for the military in this state too, and if Clark is on the ticket you can absolutly bet this one is in the Democratic column.

Thom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. there was coal industry propaganda that
Gore's environmental policy would shut down the mines and the union members would be out of jobs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. Bush will NEVER win California
And Arnold would be well served to stay off any stage with him. They might have voted for Arnold in a odd circumstance, but they will NEVER vote for Bush. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. Here is the Kansas info
Governors

Sebelius current
Finney 91-95
Carlin 79-87
Docking 57-61

US Senator

McGill 30-39

US Representatives

Moore current
Slattery 83-95
Glickman 77-95
Keys 75-79
Roy 71-75
George 59-61
Hargis 59-61
Breeding 57-63




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. You forgot one
A Docking Served from 1966 to 1974.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kansas ? You are dreamin - WV and MN bear watching
Arizona possibly...I think the two states we should watch are West Virginia and Minnesota. I think West Virginia may come back, particularly if Dean is the nominee. Minnesota is gonna be a hard fight. I'd put it leaning Democratic...but it is going to be close
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC