Ann Coulter poorly attempts to refute AL FRANKEN

[Adenoid_Hynkel]

in her new rambling, all-over-the-map, column. i wrote better stuff than this in 8th grade.

she cherry picks her examples to 'refute' and does a piss-poor job at them. she doesn't mention that the earnhardt thing was presented as the crowing argument in her book and that this little mistake we keep beating her up over should have been researched a bit more than the shoddy half-assed effort she made

amazing how casually someone brushes off deliberately lying in print

you can read it here, if you dare:
www.anncoulter.org

[Champion Jack]

1. Yeah it;s easy for her to throw her crap up on a web site

But, let's see her debate Al live.

[ReadTomPaine]

2. She must have missed eating her bucket of red meat this morning. <eom>

[coldwatercyn]

3. why bother

to read anything she writes. She is an too stupid for words. She is too busy trying to figure out which side of her head her hair should go. She gives bimbos a bad name.