Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Someone is leaking like a sieve today......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:19 PM
Original message
Someone is leaking like a sieve today......
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 07:25 PM by hang a left
Cheney

Use of Intelligence

Inaccurate Job Description of Plame

No Top Secret Security Clearance

Damn this is getting good!!!

edit:

Spelling correction attributed to my good friends below.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. sieve nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. sieve is the word
you could always use colander as a substitute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. that would be sieve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. D'oh!
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 07:22 PM by Der Blaue Engel
Edited to avoid the gang-up. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good is an understatement
Anticipation is killing me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Maybe good..
But it could have reprecussions that could tear this country apart. Be mindful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. the country is already torn apart....
and so is Iraq, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Hello? Let's bring it on!

Something has got to give and if they can make this a better place, let's bring it on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Never misunderestimate our friendly CIA. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seansky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Inaccurate Job Description of Plame???????what's up w/that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Inaccurate info may help CIA leak probe
Inaccurate info may help CIA leak probe

JOHN SOLOMON and PETE YOST

Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Information attributed to Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff in New York Times reporter Judith Miller's interview notes is incorrect, offering prosecutors a potential lead to tracking the bad information to its original source.

Miller disclosed this weekend that her notes of a conversation she had with I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby on July 8, 2003 stated Cheney's top aide told her that the wife of Bush administration critic Joseph Wilson worked for the CIA's Weapons Intelligence, Non-Proliferation, and Arms Control (WINPAC) unit.

Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, never worked for WINPAC, an analysis unit in the overt side of the CIA, and instead worked in a position in the CIA's secret side, known as the directorate of operations, according to three people familiar with her work for the spy agency.

The three all spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the current secrecy requirements of Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's grand jury investigation into the leak of Plame's identity in 2003 to the media.

The revelation came as President Bush weighed in Monday by declining to say what he would do if one of his aides were indicted in the investigation, and the Pentagon looked into Miller's claim that she was granted a security clearance

snip>
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/12927207.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. If Fitzgerld holds everything tight to his chest, are the leaks coming
the lawyers of the various witnesses.

As long as we're speculating - I wonder if Cheney was asked back, but this time under oath - so he decided to fess up?

Just a joke, lads and lassies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Well one at least has been attributed to CIA agents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. And I thought that silver stake in Cheneys heart wouldn't even get noticed
I'll be damned. It worked!

Yessssssssssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC