Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judy Whoredruff and Candy Crowley spinnig debate now! CNN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 03:01 PM
Original message
Judy Whoredruff and Candy Crowley spinnig debate now! CNN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. that reminds me, I wanted to email her about that shameful farce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't need to see that
It is as predictable and obvious as so much else in Imperial America.

Don't you wish we still lived in the Old Republic, where things could still surprise you sometimes (as the raucous parade of a Free Nation is wont to do).

Imperial Amerika is as boringly predictable (so far, anyway) as Stalinist Russia.

Everyone who is watching knows what the Empire is going to do long before it happens these days.\

For instance:

I can say with 100% certainty:

The Busheviks will never catch the Right-Wing Anthrax Assassin
The Busheviks will never catch the Plame Leaker
Imperial Amerika will NEVER have a forward-looking space program nor will we ever set foot on Mars or have a moonbase (the Busheviks will spend it all on militarizing Earth orbit)

There's more, much more, as boringly predictable as if you'd said,

"I am 100% certain Stalin will never release the poltical prisoners from the Gulags, nor even admit they exist."

Same thing.

Luckily, the Busheviks are for the moment "kinder and gentler" than the Totalitarians (left and right) who have come before them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. What's she saying???
Enquiring minds and all that stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. They've gone beyond whoredom. They are operatives now.
They don't even bother to hide what they are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. *snork* No, no-----she 's an analyst!!!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Which one was more annoying?
Judy Woodruff seemed determined to destroy any show of unity the Democrats had. Then I suppose she will whine about the "splintered message."

Candy Crowley was also terrible - setting up ridiculous scenarios and hypotheticals to preface her questions. What was that all about? She asked someone, Kerry, something that assumed a nuclear attack! I don't know if she has a crush on Bush or if she is in ill health or just scared senseless about something, but she looked really stressed and unhappy and just projected sheer hatred towards the candidates.

Judy Woodruff looked tight-lipped and furious. Did they not want to be there? Why were they so angry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think Candy is miffed because Arnold didn't grope her.
....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. candy
Would he know where to begin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. He allegedly spanked some of his victims.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Video Ipecac. Great! n/t
;-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC