BBV - Long-shot candidates do startlingly well in Tulare County

[SharonAnn]

IRREGULARITIES IN CALIFORNIA RACE!!

Long-shot candidates do startlingly well in Tulare County

DIEBOLD MACHINES YIELD FISHY RESULTS!!


My friend in South Carolina writes:

I ran a number crunch of CA counties that use Diebold
machines to cast/count votes and found some weird
figures that show a skim of votes from top candidates
to people who were unlikely to affect the outcome. I
did my hand calculator work on the California election
results (from the secretary of state's site) when 96%
of precincts had reported. The website showed:

...
Conclusion
Based on the very unlikely distribution of votes for
some candidates (a meteor hit my car twice this week
sort of odds) a hand count of the affected counties to
compare with the machine reported count should be
done. This would show that the machines had been
tampered with to alter the results. As we already
know, it is not possible to audit touchscreen machines
because Diebold refuse to allow printing of a ballot
to be placed in a box as a back up for use in just
such an apparent tampering with votes.

http://www.markcrispinmiller.blogspot.com/

[Clete]

1. Curious figures my husband brought up to me.

I guess he read in the paper that 50% of registered Democrats voted and 65% of registered Republicans voted. Of course he said that half of the Demcrats were too lazy to get out and vote. That's what he thinks.

It set me to wondering about how many Democrats in poor neighborhoods might have become disenfranchised, like their vote didn't get counted or they couldn't vote for some reason or the other. I can't believe Democrats were just lazy in such an important election.