Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush unhappy with Rumsfeld - Is this article real? Or not?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dutchdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:22 PM
Original message
Bush unhappy with Rumsfeld - Is this article real? Or not?
What's odd about this article? Knight Ridder is not carrying it their website (yet it is attributed to them), the only source for this on Google News is the article from Taiwan, and there is no credit for the writer. Is this an example of disinfo from our side? Is it crafted by the Taiwanese? Or is it real?

I would love for it to be real of course. Hmmm....

--------------
Bush reportedly unhappy with Rumsfeld

2003-10-11 / Knight Ridder /

U.S.President Bush's overhaul of his top Iraq strategists reflects deep unhappiness with his national security team - particularly Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld but also Secretary of State Powell, Bush sources told the New York Daily News Thursday.

Bush's displeasure means that neither Powell nor Rumsfeld will keep his job in a second Bush term, the sources said. Powell already has signaled his intent to leave after the 2004 election but Rumsfeld had indicated he wanted to stay on.

"All this does is validate (Bush's belief that) it's time for new blood in a new administration if we're reelected," one official said. "There will be a changeover at Defense and a changeover at State."

Despite official White House denials, Bush's creation of an interagency Iraq Stabilization Group headed by national security adviser Condoleezza Rice is designed in part to halt the intramural turf battles between the Pentagon and State - infighting Bush believes has contributed to flagging public support for the war and its aftermath.

Much of Bush's disappointment is directed at Rumsfeld, who is widely seen within the administration to have been more adept at waging war than peace in Iraq.

"The president feels let down," one well-placed source told the Daily News. "He feels as if Rumsfeld was unwilling to come and get help (for the postwar effort) and thinks his inability to trust anyone other than his immediate subordinates created a serious, ongoing problem in both Afghanistan and Iraq."

Moreover, the source added, "After the war, Rumsfeld wanted to get back to (Pentagon) modernization and transformation and took his eye off the ball."

But the secretary of state comes in for his share of criticism as well.

"Powell has basically absented himself from this situation because he wanted Rumsfeld to fail - and believe me, the president's unhappy about that, too."

SNIP

http://www.etaiwannews.com/World/2003/10/11/1065838658.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
the_real_38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. He put Condi Rice in charge of Iraq...
... Rumsfeld had a little tantrum about it in front of the press the other day.

One thing that's funny about these corporate guys - they can seem completely confident (I'm talking about Rumsfeld), even when they're screwing up royally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dutchdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yes I knew that
I am more interested in the veracity of the article. Whether it is real or not. I cannot find it on Ridder. That's all. I would love it to be true but just trying not to post something that is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is a White House "leak" to make Bush look like ....
the poor innocent victim who had NO idea what was happening, it was those other bad guys. Pretty pathetic attempt to take the focus off Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's real but it would be more "real" if the New York Times or CNN...
...picked it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. this was in yesterday's new york daily news
the author was interviewed by a couple of talking heads on cable news yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dutchdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Great
Edited on Sat Oct-11-03 01:59 PM by dutchdemocrat
Thanks. That's what I wanted to know. Who was the author?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think....
...distancing himself from the people he picked is going to work. He's done enough passing the buck...he's got to take responsibility at some point. Back during the election when I would ask Republican friends "How can you vote for this moron?" The answer always was "Oh...but he's surrounding himself with smart people!" Well...I hope they learned that you have to BE smart to make a smart choice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. They have to have a fall guy
It's just a question of who.
Powell seemed likely before; Rummy seems
likely now. Someone, besides Bush, has to
fall on their sword so it'll look good
for the BFEE. SOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC