Here's two different versions of Limbaugh's back problem which supposedly led to his pain killer addiction.
The first: "Newsweek's" portrayal of a loner, a person uncomfortable in Private life, who hated to walk and stayed in his house watching NFL sports from his couch. A person totally different from his Radio persona.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/979355.asp?0ql=c7pThe Second: Up on Buzzlfash right now is a Commentary with a link from a Buzz Reader who says just this year he was in Celebrity Golf tournaments and that he has been in many Celebrity tournaments since his supposed back injury and addiction.
http://www.buzzflash.com/buzzscripts/buzz.dll/sub3 A BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY
BuzzFlash Follow-up:
From a very recent 2003 article on GolfServ.com:
"No slouch with the sticks himself after only playing for the past six years, Limbaugh is visiting
Lake Tahoe for the American Century Championship this year for the first time. Limbaugh has
played in the PGA Tour's Bob Hope Chrysler Classic three times and the AT&T Pebble Beach
Pro-Am twice, making the cut in 2003 and playing on the weekend with PGA Tour professional
Tom Pernice."
And even when lying through his drug addict haze, Rush couldn't let go of his money-making
vile obsession with the Clintons. He's like a junky radio broadcaster verbal stalker:
"The thing about golf, really," Limbaugh said, "is you'll find out what people are all about. You
find out whether they cheat. You find out whether they quit. You'll find out whether they fudge
or cheat. Any number of characteristics that people possess in their personalities will come
out, usually in 18 holes of golf."
"I mean, when I play we don't even call them 'mulligans,'" he added, "we call them 'Clintons.'"
(
http://www.golfserv.com/gdc/news/article.asp?id=15650)
___________________________
Which story is the truth? He had to be a decent enough player to be invited to the Celebrity Tournaments, and yet Newsweek presents a pathetic loner, who was increasing isolated from people around him. :shrug:
SPIN? Who's correct?