|
Recently, in my small mostly-Republican town in mid-Michigan, our County Board of Commissioners -- whose main job is to fund road projects -- decided to write a resolution saying that marriage is only between a man and a woman and supporting an amendment to our state constitution saying the same.
The Board of Commissioners overwhelmingly voted to support the resolution, despite the handful of gay and lesbian couples who showed up at the meeting to speak out against it.
The message seemed pretty clear: "Queers not welcome here."
My letter to the newspaper was printed last Thursday, and is printed below (except I took out the name of the commissioner to protect the guilty).
=====================================================================
Good job, {Resolution's Author's Name} and the Board of Commissioners! I think it's about time that someone stood up for the sanctity of marriage. Right now we live in a world where almost half of all first-time marriages end in divorce, where celebrity marriages don't even last as long as a gallon of milk, where we're bombarded with "reality" television shows like "Who Wants to Marry a Millionaire?" and "Married By America." So protecting the sanctity of marriage sounds like a pretty darned good idea to me.
That's why I'm puzzled over this move by {Resolution's Author} and the commissioners to protect the "sanctity of marriage" by passing a resolution urging the state to limit the rights of homosexuals. Seems to me that it's us straight people who have been screwing up the "sanctity of marriage" so far. It's like author Ernest Benn once said, "Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy."
Way to go, guys!
|