Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CSPAN II seminar on journalistic ethics.............NAUSEATING

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
julka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 08:01 PM
Original message
CSPAN II seminar on journalistic ethics.............NAUSEATING
Marvin Kalb, Bob Schieffer, Dan Schorr, Karen Jurgensen (USA Today), Margaret Warner sit there, patting themselves on the back on how ethical they are, how well they serve the common weal, how WONDERFULLY the embedded reporters served both the government AND the American public.

this last assertion was heartily seconded by Schieffer, who said, most ironically, I thought, that they have lots of ways to get a story out that needs to be told (referring to the possible difficulties in publishing work unflattering to the DOD, etal).

Like Bush AWOL, PNAC, WMD serial lies, right?

I saw only the first half hour, so they may have covered other stuff.

time for QandA right now.

can't wait to see if anyone in audience is not swallowing the swill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Update us if anyone slips a good Q thru the censors
If you can stand watching for long.

I don't know how you tv folks continue watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's very disheartening
a journalism student who spent the last term in Europe just asked what Margaret Warner called a "very profound" question.

why is the coverage of the war I saw overseas so much different than it is in America?

Warner said she thought it was perhaps cultural.....seeing things from an American perspecitive, despite trying not to be manipulated.

Trying? not very hard.

Kalb falls back on Rashomon phenomenon, citing four different views of US/Panama invasion back in 89. please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Did you hear Daniel Schorr talking about Rush's drug problem?
He nailed it on the head! basically implied Rush is a hypocritical sob.
The moderator quickly said "interesting, interesting... no more time."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I just caught a whiff of that.....was looking this up:
Kalb vs. Len Downie, and his obsession with Clinton, leading to the IGNORED, but excellent book by Kalb:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Gore-2004-Community/message/24886?source=1

old link from MWO, I think. I remember reading a three-parter from them when Kalb's book came out.

brief synopsis of Kalb's book, "One Scandalous Story: Clinton, Lewinsky, and Thirteen Days That Tarnished American Journalism"

reason I'm including this is that Broder mentioned what a great, scrupulously ethical editor is Len Downie. here's how the above link refers to one of those MOST responsible for the entire Whitewater fiasco:

during the early days of the pseudo-scandal, First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton invited Downie to the White House, where she recounted for him her story of the truth about Whitewater. Clinton blamed former-friend and con-man James McDougal as the source of her problems with Whitewater, acknowledged that she "probably made a mistake" in the way she handled the matter, and said that "Bill had nothing to do with it." But Downie dismissed her account and thereafter resolutely refused to give it any credence at all - even after numerous investigations showed that her account was completely accurate and truthful. Instead, Downie embarked on a crusade against Hillary Clinton as a liar.

The result was that not only the Clintons but dozens of hard-working White House staffers were smeared, hauled before witch-hunting congressional committees, and subjected to Ken Starr's inquisition.

Given the time and energy spent on the fake Whitewater scandal-and the investment of Downie's reputation -- it is no wonder that the Post became the reliable faucet for leaks from Ken Starr's office. In for a penny, in for a pound, huh, Len?


urging all to refresh their memories of this creep, just in case anyone's forgotten just how NOT liberal this sad excuse for a newspapper had become during the Clinton Inquisition (and I can't stand WJC, btw, for the most part).

see Howard Zinn's updated ending of A People's History of the US for an excellent compendium of all the reasons not to like his policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Talk about mental masturbation -
It's odd how CNN not telling all about Iraq is brought up when it is never mentioned about the Palestinian side of the story is squashed by Israel. I rememember about 2 years ago for maybe a week CNN covered Palestine honestly, then it wass fade to black as far as real coverage goes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. that's the part where I tuned in
isn't it amazing that THAT's what they chose to discuss, instead of, say Love Canal, Love Story, Templegate, etc.

or how about the TWO HUNDRED LEAKS that the guy from the Washington Times spewed out, WRT to DOD/Iraq war secrets?

seen that one?

it was in Truthout, Oct. 4, either in the Dean/Salon or Ray Johnson link. just read it today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC