Whose worse...

[pasadenaboy]

HANNITY or colmes? I say colmes because he claims to be a liberal, but is just a sell out. That is worse than being a conservative fascist like Hannity, in my opinion.

[alcuno]

1. Who's worse?

Colmes is there to be the weak liberal foil for Hannity. He's just doing his job. I do like the title of his book, "Red, White, and Liberal."

Being a conservative fascist is the definition of worst.

[pasadenaboy]

2. How embarrassing.

I have a college education and write whose instead of who's.

[Tom Kitten]

3. Poor Colmes...

At this point in his career, the only thing I can see him doing that would preserve (any shred of dignity in) his career as a "liberal" would be to commit public hari-kari and literally spew his guts over his Fox Daddies (ie faux pas)...But at least he would finally show some intestinal fortitude...

[eleny]

4. hannity

the other day, on his radio program, i heard him say "god help us if they win the election. they want to destroy our way of life".

now who's more dangerous, who's poisoning the culture? i think hannity is far more dangerous in the long run. i heard he picked colmes. someone here at du posted that they first tried another liberal opposite hannity. the guy was so powerful, they got rid of him and hannity picked colmes. that's what a chicken-shit hannity really is. and we all know that too much chicken shit is a killer.

[Tom Kitten]

5. then this is a red herring argument...

the real questions are "why did they choose Colmes over all other liberals", and who are the ones who choose and why do they choose the people they choose and,given that, what is their motivation for choosing who they choose? Sounds confusing but obfuscation is part of the method.