According to
ABC News:...the commander of the battalion, Lt. Col. Dominic Caraccilo, said the "letter-writing initiative" was all his idea...
Caraccilo wrote that his staff drafted the letter, he edited it and reviewed it and then offered it to the soldiers. "Every soldier who signed that letter did so after a careful read," he said. "Some, who could find the time, decided to send their own versions, while others chose not to take part in the initiative."
Caraccilo was unapologetic, saying that the letter "perfectly reflects what each of these brave soldiers has and continues to accomplish on the ground." Just because the letters use the same kind of phrasing that Bush speechwriters do is no reason to believe that Caraccilo's "staff" extends all the way to the White House, is there? Similiarly, it's probably just a coincidence that Caraccilo got his idea at the same that the Bush White House decided to do a big public relations push. And there's something about Caraccilo's "unapologeticness" that's so resoundingly yet dismaying "Bush regime."
Of course, that doesn't explain why at least two soliders deny signing the letter. One soldier says knows nothing about it, and he has a fairly good alibi: He's currently in the hospital recovering from shrapnel wounds. I don't think HE'S exactly qualified to claim that all's well in Iraq!
rocknation