Interesting breakdown of who got to talk most, least in the CNN sponsored debate. The article is worth reading in its entirety.
http://www.madison.com/captimes/opinion/column/nichols/58757.php<edit>
The grumblings from Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld are so laughable that no one in America - with the exception of the recently institutionalized Rush Limbaugh and his fairly imbalanced friends over at the Fox News Channel - has even tried to take them seriously. Media coverage of this administration and its war is still about as aggressive as Pravda's coverage of Stalin.
<edit>
This is National Journal's breakdown of how much time each of the candidates was permitted to speak during Thursday's debate:
Howard Dean - 14 minutes, 7 seconds.
John Kerry - 12 minutes, 31 seconds.
Wesley Clark - 10 minutes, 36 seconds.
Richard Gephardt - 10 minutes, 2 seconds.
Joe Lieberman - 9 minutes, 26 seconds.
Carol Moseley Braun - 8 minutes, 39 seconds.
Al Sharpton - 8 minutes, 28 seconds.
John Edwards - 8 minutes, 0 seconds.
Kucinich - 5 minutes, 9 seconds.
As a result of the lopsided nature of the debate, it might have been easy to think that the range of debate within the Democratic Party with regard to the war runs the gamut from the "it was a bad idea, but we're stuck now" crowd (Dean, Clark, Kerry) to the "it was a good idea, but we're stuck now" crowd (Gephardt, Edwards, Lieberman).
Though Kucinich had just released a detailed plan for turning over responsibility for Iraq to the United Nations - which would, by any measure, have been a fine topic for discussion in a debate among candidates who could end up dealing with that precise issue - he was accorded dramatically less time to explain his views than Braun and Sharpton, whose campaigns have been shamefully neglected by most media.
more...